VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Daniele del Re <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
15 Jan 2003 02:23:59 -0800 (PST)Wed, 15 Jan 2003 02:23:59 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (24 lines)

actually even the mm2 scan for the new selection is not the same as in the
BAD. May you send me your fit output files? I will try to rerun the fit
and compare.

 Daniele

>
> in   http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/011603/  you'll  observe
> that the mm2  scan is not quite the  same as in July even  for the old
> track/photon selection. Trk3Gam0 screws the  B+ in the mm2 scan badly,
> while  the  B0 are  decent  (better than  the  current  B+). This  was
> different in July, where the B+ scans both in mx and mm2 were stable.
>
> I  would not say  that this  increases my  confidence in  any physics-
> inspired explanation.
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2