VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
7 Dec 2006 23:06:47 +0000 (GMT)Thu, 7 Dec 2006 23:06:47 +0000 (GMT)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (30 lines)
Hi Kerstin, I'm not sure If we should worry about this. I know that 
Concezio has seen them and thinks that they are okay. Also I think the 
main thing is that they are small?
Ciao, C.C.

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Kerstin Tackmann wrote:

>
> Hi Chukwudi, all,
>
> it seems that these errors are not very stable with IP cut
> (and by stable I mean they are neither roughly constant, nor
> are they monotonous...). Do we understand this? If not,
> is this something to worry about?
>
> Kerstin
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, CHUKWUDI KWEKU CLARKE wrote:
>
>> Hi all so my webpage has the S/P systematics for the complete Breco
>> sample. The numbers for the "no pi0" sample are wrong.
>> The numbers can be found using the link at the top of the page.
>> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~clarke1/protected/clarke1/IPsysRelErr.html
>> Cheers, C.C.
>>
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2