LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  March 2002

VUB-RECOIL March 2002

Subject:

fit on the generic mc

From:

Daniele del Re <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

12 Mar 2002 19:36:25 -0800 (PST)Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:36:25 -0800 (PST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (82 lines)


As a crosscheck I tried to extract the ratio of BR from the full set of
generic MC we have at the moment (SP3+SP4). I'm not sure about the
statistics but it should be not far from 45fb-1 and Urs should confirm
this. The full chain is applied, I mean

 - creation of analysis root files using Ibu
 - analysis code (anaRecoil) run on them and creation of reduced Tree
 - finally VubFit on the reduced Tree

 The MC to train the fit for the background shapes is the total of Breco
cocktail. I did not weight properly the different contribution
(Dstar,Dc,.. ) as we have on data because doing that we have just 160fb-1
and this introduce a large systematics due to the MC. For sure, if we
decide to use the full set of breco cocktail MC (350fb-1) we should take
into account the different n(B0)/n(Bch) respect to the data and I think
Oliver can tell us something about this systematics.

 The MC used to calculate Vub efficiency and shapes is the
vubmix-brecococktail one. I will try ASAP to use the vubmix-generic.

 The fitted sample (completely indipendent) is the full set of generic MC.

 We expect to see something like:

 BR(b->ulnu)/BR(b->clnu) ~ = 1.16%

 since the BR(b->ulnu) generated value for SP3 (~1/4 of the total) is
9.4*10^-4 and SP4 one is 13.5*10^-4. If we look at the mes plot for all
the events and for vub and vcb events we get

all : 309 K
vub : 689+-40         -> BR(b->ulnu)~1.1*10^-4
vcb : 66.0K+-.5K      -> BR(b->clnu)~10.7%
vub p(lep)>1.&&one lept : 353 +- 26
vcb p(lep)>1.&&one lept : 29.4K +- .3K -> BR/BR ~ 1.2%

and everything seems to be quite in agreement with the generation
and the correspondent plot are in

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mesall.gif
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mesvub.gif
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mesvcb.gif
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mesvublept.gif
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mesvcblept.gif



The result of the fit is the following

BR/BR = 0.0130+-0.0034

and this is very compatibile with the generated value.

the plot are in

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/data.eps
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/fitresults_nocat.eps

(some fits are not optimal but fixing some parameters the results is
pretty stable)

We have 100 Vub events for Mx<1.6 GeV (-> 135 events considering the whole
spectrum) and 244 background events.

Taking into account the difference in statistics (on data we should have
170K events) and the PDG BR (1.7*10^-3) and assuming that the efficiency
on data is the same of the MC we could estimate that we will
have 78 vub events, 134 bkg events and error should be

sigma(BR/BR) = 0.0042

sigma(BR/BR)/(BR/BR)=25% -> sigma(Vub)/(Vub)=12.5%


Daniele





Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use