LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  April 2002

VUB-RECOIL April 2002

Subject:

another way to extract BR(b->ulnu)/BR(b->clnu)

From:

Daniele del Re <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

18 Apr 2002 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT)Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (38 lines)


Hi all,

 I implemented a new option in the fit that performs a fit based on a
three components fit: b->ulnu, b->clnu and other on the full Mx spectrum
(this was actually the first implementation I proposed many months ago).
All the three shapes are fixed from the MC and they have a big bin 0-1.6
GeV. After the fit you can do the subtraction of the background as well
in order to know the structure of the signal Mx distribution.

 This method should be actually identical to the one with the background
subtraction but in this case you don't care about the assumed BR(b->ulnu)
to get the right b->ulnu contribution for Mx>1.6GeV since it
is automatically included according to the fitted ratio of BR's.
Then this method should be more robust and you don't have to perform the
fit in many iteration to get the right tail at high Mx. This method is
also useful in the fit with multiplicity categories. In this case the
subtraction should introduce a very large systematics since you don't
know the ratio of BR in each multiplicity category and you can make a
large error in the fraction of signal events you are assuming for Mx>1.6GeV.

 First tests show that the value obtained with this option is pretty
compatible with the one using the subtraction. The error is slightly
lower (probably the additional information in the first bin makes the
error smaller).

 You can see an example of the output on 300fb-1 (cocktail) in

 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/MCshapefitresults_nocat.eps

 This implementation could replace the old one. We should discuss this in
the next meeting.

 Daniele



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use