Hoi,
[sorry, forgot the Mx scan ...]
1. MM scans as a function of the Mx cut:
Mx cut <BRBR> e-4 Plot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1.45 148+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.45-stability.eps
1.50 146+/-10 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.50-stability.eps
1.55 157+/-10 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.55-stability.eps
1.60 187+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.60-stability.eps
1.65 187+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.65-stability.eps
1.70 181+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.70-stability.eps
1.75 186+/-12 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.75-stability.eps
The error quoted on <BRBR> is the error of a fit with a constant,
indicated on the plots with a yellow band.
2. Scan over Mx: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/mx-stability.eps
For the remaining scans, the Mx cut was set to 1.55 GeV.
3. Scan over p*: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/P-stability.eps
I am confused as to why lowering the p* cut does not propagate into
the fit. Need to look more closely.
4. Scan over Mx: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/Q-stability.eps
The categories are:
1 Q = 0 (default)
2 Q = -1, 0
3 Q = 0, +1
4 Q = -1, 0, +1
Cheers,
--U.
|