Hi Urs,
what is <BrBr>? It has a small error, is it the mean over all points of
the scan, assuming them uncorrelated? This is not the band you want to
compare with (in the limit of infinite steps in the scan the error would
be 0). At most I would superimpose the band of the 'working point'
measurement.
ciao
ric
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Urs Langenegger wrote:
>
> Hoi,
>
> 1. MM scans as a function of the Mx cut:
>
> Mx cut <BRBR> e-4 Plot
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1.45 148+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.45-stability.eps
> 1.50 146+/-10 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.50-stability.eps
> 1.55 157+/-10 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.55-stability.eps
> 1.60 187+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.60-stability.eps
> 1.65 187+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.65-stability.eps
> 1.70 181+/-11 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.70-stability.eps
> 1.75 186+/-12 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/MM-1.75-stability.eps
>
> The error quoted on <BRBR> is the error of a fit with a constant,
> indicated on the plots with a yellow band.
>
> For the remaining scans, the Mx cut was set to 1.55 GeV.
>
>
> 2. Scan over p*: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/P-stability.eps
> I am confused as to why lowering the p* cut does not propagate into
> the fit. Need to look more closely.
>
> 3. Scan over Mx: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/062102/Q-stability.eps
> The categories are:
>
> 1 Q = 0 (default)
> 2 Q = -1, 0
> 3 Q = 0, +1
> 4 Q = -1, 0, +1
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
|