Yes, of course..
I've choose the wrong example...
Yust to say it again:
if there's no D decay the weight for D events is 1.....
sorry for the confusion,
Alessio
______________________________________________________
Alessio Sarti
Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
tel +39-0532-781928 Ferrara
roma +39-06-49914338
SLAC +001-650-926-2972
"Vorrei tanto sapere chi e' che va in giro a costruire quadrati
sull'ipotenusa"
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Riccardo Faccini wrote:
> Ciao Alessio,
> >
> > B->D*lnu (only weight from B) = wB
> > B->Dlnu (weight from B * weight from D) = wB*wD
>
> I am completely confused about this statement. Why should you ignore the D
> decay when the B goes to D*lnu ?!? D* goes to D that then decays itself...
> I think we should always have the product of the two, but vary only one of
> the two at a time: when the wB are varied, the wD should be fixed to
> rescale the BF to the PDG ones and viceversa.
> ciao
> ric
>
> >
> > This whole procedure has to be tested and checked for bugs (correct
> > values for all BR, correct implementation of reweighting).
> >
> > Let me know any comment or question.
> > Cheers,
> > Alessio
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Alessio Sarti
> > Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
> > tel +39-0532-781928 Ferrara
> > roma +39-06-49914338
> > SLAC +001-650-926-2972
> >
> > "Vorrei tanto sapere chi e' che va in giro a costruire quadrati
> > sull'ipotenusa"
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|