LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  June 2002

VUB-RECOIL June 2002

Subject:

mm2, kaon PID killing and B->D(*,**)lnu mm2 distributions

From:

Daniele del Re <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

02 Jun 2002 14:50:57 -0700 (PDT)Sun, 02 Jun 2002 14:50:57 -0700 (PDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (92 lines)



Hi all,

 as I mentioned in the friday meeting, the disagreement between data and
MC in the missing mass squared is only in the sample with one or more
kaons. I tried to switch on the kaon pid killing, since we were running
the MC using the montecarlo particle ID for kaons.
 Unfortunatly the results are not encouraging and the disagreement is
still there (actually it is a bit better but still there)

 in

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/rightkaon/allcomparisonmm2allcuts.ps
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/rightkaon/b0comparisonmm2allcuts.ps
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/rightkaon/bchacomparisonmm2allcuts.ps


 you can find the mm2 distribution after the cuts for all events, B0's and
charged B's. As you see the disagreement is just for Bcha (already known,
see my previous postings).



 Then, the remaning handle is a possible difference in the generetion.
Waiting for the reweighting from Alessio and Riccardo I tried to
understand which are the differences between neutral and charged B as far
as the missing mass squared distribution is concerned.

I must remind you that on data B0 and Bch distributions are similar while
large differences are present on MC.

In the following plots

  lepton cuts
  -----------

no normalization
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mm2comp.ps

same area normalization
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mm2comp_allcuts.ps


  ~all cuts
  ---------

no normalization
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mm2compnorm.ps

same area normalization
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mm2compnorm_allcuts.ps


you can see the mm2 distribution for 5 different categories on MC.

1: upper left:   B->Dlnu
2: upper right:  B->D*lnu
3: middle left:  B->D2*lnu
4: middle right: B->D1*lnu
5: bottom      : B->DXlnu


In red the charged B distribution is shown, in black the B0 one.
As you see the most evident difference is in B->Dlnu but also in B->D*lnu
is pretty different (actually all categories show differences).

For sure B->Dlnu has to be different since for B0 we have D+ and for B+
D0. These two D mesons decay in different charged multiplicities due to
the initial charge and then we should expect different resolutions.

For B->D*lnu we should have something different before the cuts. D*0's
decay in a soft photon or neutral pion while the D*+'s in charged soft
pion. Then the resolution should be better in the B0 case. We have a 30%
of D*+->D+pi0 but these decays can hardly explain such a difference. On
the other hand the situation should be worse
for B0 after the cuts, since the Qtot cut should worsen decays in a
charged soft pion.
Plots show that B0 are always worse.


I will try to repeate this study with similar multiplicity categories.


These plots show that the B->Dlnu reweighting can't fix the disagreement.
On the other hand the D decay reweighting could help.

 Daniele



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use