> naively one would expect that a softer cut in DELTAQ would lead to less
> model dependence (e.g. in the limit of no cut on DELTAQ you do not
> dependent on the modeling of DELTAQ distribution from the MC at all).
> Or in other words, claiming you have a MC-DATA discrepancy for events
> with DELTAQ=+-1 BUT not for DELTAQ=0 is hard to believe and seems to
> me unlikely ... someone might even say that your statement is a
> contradiction by it self .... .
I am claming that, since the background is twice the one with Qtot=0, a
stronger dependecy of the result on Mx could be due to it.
Daniele
|