>
> > it is to be noted that the result on the generic agrees with the default
> > value within the systematics from MC statistics that we would
> > quote here...
I was comparing the fit on the generic with the fit on the cocktail
(0.0170)
ciao
ric
> > ciao
> > ric
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Daniele del Re wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > in order to quantify the impact of the crossfeed in the measurement, I
> > > fit the data both with generic MC and generic+crossfeed MC as model.
> > >
> > > The results are:
> > >
> > > generic:
> > >
> > > BRBR = 0.0140658 +- 0.00365657(stat) +- 0.00198155(MC stat)
> > >
> > >
> > > generic + crossfeed:
> > >
> > > BRBR = 0.0137173 +- 0.00345909(stat) +- 0.00192688(MC stat)
> > >
> > >
> > > So the difference is the 0.0035 and the systematics we can quote is 2.5%.
> > >
> > > Daniele
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|