LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  July 2002

VUB-RECOIL July 2002

Subject:

Duplicate killing done

From:

Alessio Sarti <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

08 Jul 2002 08:31:30 -0700 (PDT)Mon, 08 Jul 2002 08:31:30 -0700 (PDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (126 lines)

Hi all,
we managed to produce data files without duplicates....
Here are the first results.

a) We have killed:
    -all the duplicates among same seed and same superblock (those
 are probably due to 'technical reasons')
    -duplicated events among differents seeds superblocks keeping the most
 pure event

b) some numbers:

We start with  4720765 events (before lept cut)
we found        618485 duplicates
Here's the breakdown (before lepton cut)
******Duplicates in D0  ***********
  326752 duplicates_d0
******Duplicates in D   ***********
  130321 duplicates_dc
******Duplicates in D*  ***********
   41052 duplicates_dstar
******Duplicates in D*0 ***********
  120354 duplicates_dstar0

And here's the breakdonw per seed per superblock (bef. lepton cut)
  244408 fin_d0_sb3
   81393 fin_d0_sb2
     951 fin_d0_sb1
   85949 fin_dc_sb3
   42273 fin_dc_sb2
    2099 fin_dc_sb1
   21836 fin_dstar_sb3
   17251 fin_dstar_sb2
    1965 fin_dstar_sb1
   72261 fin_dstar0_sb3
   45116 fin_dstar0_sb2
    2977 fin_dstar0_sb1

c) When running on events with lepton cut applied we found

                   entries     dupl killed

d0_sb1.log:Found 4335            59 Num. of duplicates
d0_sb2.log:Found 39912         5548 Num. of duplicates
d0_sb3.log:Found 79429   ---->      Still working :)
dc_sb1.log:Found 2064            96 Num. of duplicates
dc_sb2.log:Found 24182         1752 Num. of duplicates
dc_sb3.log:Found 61539         3135 Num. of duplicates
dstar0_sb1.log:Found 1667        39 Num. of duplicates
dstar0_sb2.log:Found 19335     1006 Num. of duplicates
dstar0_sb3.log:Found 73335     4535 Num. of duplicates
dstar_sb1.log:Found 4501        191 Num. of duplicates
dstar_sb2.log:Found 22700      1465 Num. of duplicates
dstar_sb3.log:Found 11220      1280 Num. of duplicates

d) here's the Mes distribution of all candidates

pre killing (upperplot black) after killing (upperplot red) and the
difference btw the two (lowerplot)

  1) after letpon cut
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~asarti/recoil/killing/mes
     mes_*.eps plots..... (obvious names)
  1) after all cut
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~asarti/recoil/killing/mes
     GEmes_*.eps plots..... (obvious names)

In superblocks 1 the contribution of peaking events comes mainly for
duplicated events in same sedd-superblock (events duplicated for technical
problem)
In all the other Mes plot the contribution of duplicated events is almost
not peaking (there is still some peaking evidence in sb2...)

All the various contributions are higly suppressed when applying the
GoodEvent cut...


e) Here are the results for the fit having applied the killing to
duplicates

Ball_Q0 :BRBR = 0.0178524 +- 0.00447615(stat) +- 0.00125581(MC stat)
B0_Q0   :BRBR = 0.00243623 +- 0.00733719(stat) +- 0.00220839(MC stat)
Bc_Q0   :BRBR = 0.0281067 +- 0.00564098(stat) +- 0.0018121(MC stat)

Ball_Q1 :BRBR = 0.0279537 +- 0.00502328(stat) +- 0.00145547(MC stat)
B0_Q1   :BRBR = 0.0159362 +- 0.0079332(stat) +- 0.00231999(MC stat)
Bc_Q1   :BRBR = 0.0366416 +- 0.00649998(stat) +- 0.00206532(MC stat)

   Here are the default results

Ball_Q0 :BRBR = 0.0169654 +- 0.00429284(stat) +- 0.00124525(MC stat)
B0_Q0   :BRBR = 0.00235536 +- 0.00709451(stat) +- 0.0022153(MC stat)
Bc_Q0   :BRBR = 0.0264172 +- 0.00537667(stat) +- 0.00176521(MC stat)

Ball_Q1 :BRBR = 0.0253801 +- 0.00483479(stat) +- 0.0014268(MC stat)
B0_Q1   :BRBR = 0.0143015 +- 0.00763378(stat) +- 0.00229645(MC stat)
Bc_Q1   :BRBR = 0.0335968 +- 0.00626533(stat) +- 0.0019938(MC stat)

As you can clearly see there's no striking effect.
The statistical error increase a bit in ALL the cases for Q0 (this is
expected) while decrease a bit for Q1 (???).
There's also a systematic shift towards higer values of BRBR either for Q0
and Q1....

We're still missing the superblock3 for d0 but this is the only missing
piece of the game and adding it would not change the result too much.

Let me know questions and comments.
Cheers,
Alessio

______________________________________________________
Alessio Sarti Now in charge as RQM
 Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
 tel  +39-0532-781928  Ferrara
roma  +39-06-49914338
SLAC +001-650-926-2972

"Vorrei tanto sapere chi e' che va in giro a costruire quadrati
sull'ipotenusa"





Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use