LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  September 2002

VUB-RECOIL September 2002

Subject:

efficiency vs purity

From:

Daniele del Re <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

03 Sep 2002 11:08:18 -0700 (PDT)Tue, 03 Sep 2002 11:08:18 -0700 (PDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (52 lines)


Hi all,

 I investigated more in detail the efficiency dependence on purity I
mentioned in
 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/lwgate/VUB-RECOIL/archives/vub-recoil.200208/Author/article-80.html


 In

 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/islrecoil/QA_09032002.html

 you can find the results for 70fb-1 as far as breco yields, optimization
and efficiency stuff is concerned.

 I would like two show you two sets of plots.

 The last column of the table called "Ratio's for Data" shows the ratio
Nsignal events (after allcuts) / Nsignal events (after lepton cuts) in
bins of the purity of the single mode, that is actually a measurement of
the efficiency vs the purity of our sample. If there is a problem and a
lower efficiency, it is present only in the last 2-3 bins (15%<pur<10%,
 10%<pur<5%, 5%<pur).

 This problem can be due either to Physics (efficiency depends for
some reasons to the reconstructed mode) or to a mes fit problem.


 In order to check the first possibility, I checked the same distribution
on generic MC. In the last column of "Ratio's for Generic MC" table you
can find the same plots for the generic MC (unfortunately the bins do not
containt exactly the same modes as the data ones). As shown, the
dependency seems to be gone. Then the first possibility could be excluded.

 As a consequence, this effect could be only an artefact of the mes fits
(and this is the impression you have if you look at the single mes fit)
and I checked that is due to the combinatoric shape parametrization
(fixing the signal shape I got the same dependece), that is modeled
using an argus function.

 I will perform more studies as far as the fit parametrization is
concerned but I have to say that the problem we are observing is not a big
problem since the purity optimization I performed few days ago basically
removes the last two bins of the efficiency plots.

 Daniele





Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use