I'm sorry I didn't read the meail toward the end.
I do not need to have the file name to tell the difference.
Teo main changes have occurred btw the weights compared at the end of your
message:
1st bin is no longer ranging from 0.0 -> 1.41 but from 0.0 -> 1.2 (reduces
a lot the weight that we need to apply in the very first bin)
The model has completely changed::
weights you're quoting are referring to the model made of
hybrid reso + hybrid non reso
while now we're using
hybrid reso + pure non reso.
That's why the weight in the first bin becomes <1.
The non reso contribution now extend to 0 (before was cut of at 1.264)
So : no matter weights are completely different.
I'm setting up a web page with results that are consistent among models
and ewights and then you'll be ablet to compare results.
Alessio
______________________________________________________
Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
tel +39-0532-974328 Ferrara
roma +39-06-49914338
SLAC +001-650-926-2972
"... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..."
(F. De Andre')
"He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in
Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity
and, for some reason, broccoli". (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids")
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Alessio Sarti wrote:
> Hi Urs,
> The formula in our code is the one quoted in the very right term of eq. 14
> in the description Ric sent out yesterday.
>
> It reads:
> (N_nr[i] - N_r[i] * e_R)
> -----------------------
> (N_r[i] * e_R)
>
> were
> N_nr
> e_r == -----
> N_r (R+1)
>
>
> hope that clears any confusion.
> Concerning the weight change: can you point me to the files you're
> comparing. I'll explain the differences...
>
> Alessio
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
> tel +39-0532-974328 Ferrara
> roma +39-06-49914338
> SLAC +001-650-926-2972
>
> "... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..."
> (F. De Andre')
>
> "He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in
> Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity
> and, for some reason, broccoli". (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids")
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Urs Langenegger wrote:
>
> >
> > Hoi Alessio and Daniele,
> >
> > the weights changed quite a bit (apart from the binning) in the low mX
> > region wrt to the initial version of Alessio. In particular, bin1
> > even changed the direction of the weight (>1 -> <1). Furthermore, is
> > it still true that eq 14 is implemented in the \xi form (which is
> > right) and not the middle form (which is wrong)?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --U.
> >
> >
> >
> > New Old
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > bin0 1 bin0 1
> > bin1 0.636768 bin1 4.09971
> > bin2 1.01957 bin2 1.30544
> > bin3 1.19293 bin3 1.763
> > bin4 1.49278 bin4 1.39208
> > bin5 1.66824 bin5 1.70889
> > bin6 1.85889 bin6 1.87091
> > bin7 1.84273 bin7 2.18299
> > bin8 1.89469 bin8 1.62982
> > bin9 1.94351 bin9 1.42043
> > bin10 1.99724 bin10 2.34514
> > bin11 1.93445 bin11 2.41272
> > bin12 2.05699 bin12 2.01187
> > bin13 2.05112 bin13 1.90189
> > bin14 2.04044 bin14 2.45736
> > bin15 2.00212 bin15 1.64077
> > bin16 1.92181 bin16 1
> > bin17 1.97053 bin17 1
> > bin18 1.94157
> > bin19 1
> > bin20 1.09792
> > bin0 1 bin0 1
> > bin1 0.690106 bin1 5.20933
> > bin2 1.39781 bin2 2.30252
> > bin3 0.987893 bin3 1.34659
> > bin4 1.34145 bin4 1.45464
> > bin5 1.17816 bin5 1.45958
> > bin6 1.75503 bin6 1.64968
> > bin7 1.89179 bin7 1.52691
> > bin8 1.95983 bin8 1.99392
> > bin9 2.01284 bin9 1.57907
> > bin10 2.03704 bin10 1.70728
> > bin11 1.97187 bin11 1.86048
> > bin12 2.05301 bin12 1.77522
> > bin13 1.99579 bin13 1.80239
> > bin14 2.02767 bin14 1.49867
> > bin15 2.06574 bin15 2.56872
> > bin16 1.94922 bin16 1
> > bin17 1.95801 bin17 1.38739
> > bin18 1.67451
> > bin19 2.13989
> > bin20 2.13989
> >
> >
>
|