LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  February 2003

VUB-RECOIL February 2003

Subject:

Error on excl BR.

From:

Alessio Sarti <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

04 Feb 2003 10:06:18 -0800 (PST)Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:06:18 -0800 (PST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (49 lines)

Hi all,
I've tried to understand what is the error that we want to use in our
theoretical sys study when varying the exclusive BRs.
The first point that needs to be clear is that I'm assuming that all the
various excl B->ulnu BR are related by isospin relations.
So, once evaluated the error, ALL the exclusive contributions can be
varied within the error by the same factor.
The problem now is what error can be quoted.
I've find out the papers were the measurement are discussed (they're
linked in http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~asarti/recoil/sys/theor_sys.html
webpage). Those are two cleo papers.
The last one is marked 16, Jan 2003. All the various measurements are
reviewed.  It is clearly said that the only two indipendent measurements
are the B0 -> pi and B0 -> rho one, while all the others are obtained via
isospin correlations.
So I've focused my attention on them.
In the DECAY.DEC we have exactly the same values as those ones quoted in
PDG: so the error quoted in PDG directly applies to our excl. BR
measurement. The only attention must be paid weighting the errors coming
from rho and pi decays. Those two errors are slighlty different (+/- 60
(symm) on pi and +0.6 -0.7 (asymm) for rho.
Should I do the weighted average of those two errors (given that the
values are exactly scaling with our DECAY.DEC value) and come up with an
asymm error or should I use a symm err of ~0.65 (reasonable error for
doing the sys study)?

It might also be said that values quoted in latest CLEO paper are slightly
different from those ones quoted in PDG but they're all quite consistent
within the present errors, so I propose to stick to PDG errors/values...

Let me know any doubt/question.
Cheers,
Alessio

______________________________________________________
Alessio Sarti     Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
 tel  +39-0532-974328  Ferrara
roma  +39-06-49914338
SLAC +001-650-926-2972

"... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..."
(F. De Andre')

"He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in
Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity
and, for some reason, broccoli".  (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids")


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use