Hoi,
this is from a mail to Alessio and for the record if someone wants to
reproduce the default "p00". The relevant part is marked with **.
As you probably remember, I split the official chains into subchains,
so as to have roughly equal amounts of events per job and so that it
finishes about in the same time (it's no strict). Being a swiss
bureaucrat, I also prefer a slightly more strict naming scheme. These
are the only intended differences to the "official" chain files.
** There is one unintended difference: I forgot to include the march
** production of 2002 B+ for p00. My mistake, I apologize.
In the following, you can see "my" chains which are just symlinks to
the "official" ones:
shire01> pwd
/u/ec/ursl/macros/fsx/vub/VubAnalysis/chains
shire01>ls -l csx-genb*
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 27 Jan 28 11:09 csx-genbch-new-2000a -> generic/csx-genbch-new-2000
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:09 csx-genbch-new-2000b -> generic/cdec-genbch-new-2000
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 27 Mar 28 10:56 csx-genbch-new-2000c -> generic/csx-marbch-new-2000
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:12 csx-genbch-new-2001a -> generic/csx-genbch-new-2001a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:12 csx-genbch-new-2001b -> generic/csx-genbch-new-2001b
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:12 csx-genbch-new-2001c -> generic/csx-genbch-new-2001c
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:12 csx-genbch-new-2001d -> generic/cdec-genbch-new-2001
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Mar 28 11:00 csx-genbch-new-2001e -> generic/csx-marbch-new-2001a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Mar 28 11:00 csx-genbch-new-2001f -> generic/csx-marbch-new-2001b
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:14 csx-genbch-new-2002a -> generic/csx-genbch-new-2002a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:14 csx-genbch-new-2002b -> generic/csx-genbch-new-2002b
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:14 csx-genbch-new-2002c -> generic/cdec-genbch-new-2002
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 27 Jan 28 11:10 csx-genbnu-new-2000a -> generic/csx-genbnu-new-2000
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:10 csx-genbnu-new-2000b -> generic/cdec-genbnu-new-2000
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 27 Mar 28 10:55 csx-genbnu-new-2000c -> generic/csx-marbnu-new-2000
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:12 csx-genbnu-new-2001a -> generic/csx-genbnu-new-2001a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:12 csx-genbnu-new-2001b -> generic/csx-genbnu-new-2001b
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:12 csx-genbnu-new-2001c -> generic/csx-genbnu-new-2001c
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:13 csx-genbnu-new-2001d -> generic/cdec-genbnu-new-2001
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 27 Mar 28 10:57 csx-genbnu-new-2001e -> generic/csx-marbnu-new-2001
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:14 csx-genbnu-new-2002a -> generic/csx-genbnu-new-2002a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:14 csx-genbnu-new-2002b -> generic/csx-genbnu-new-2002b
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Jan 28 11:15 csx-genbnu-new-2002c -> generic/cdec-genbnu-new-2002
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Mar 28 11:02 csx-genbnu-new-2002d -> generic/csx-marbnu-new-2002a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ursl ec 28 Mar 28 11:02 csx-genbnu-new-2002e -> generic/csx-marbnu-new-2002b
-> 12 BCH and 13 BNU chains
These are the official ones, I believe:
shire01>ls -l generic/c*-*new*
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 34392 Jan 22 01:51 generic/cdec-genbch-new-2000
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 22892 Jan 22 01:51 generic/cdec-genbch-new-2001
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 141661 Jan 22 01:51 generic/cdec-genbch-new-2002
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 37422 Jan 22 01:51 generic/cdec-genbnu-new-2000
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 35172 Jan 22 01:51 generic/cdec-genbnu-new-2001
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 149146 Jan 22 01:55 generic/cdec-genbnu-new-2002
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 103844 Nov 25 2002 generic/csx-genbch-new-2000
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 105620 Nov 25 2002 generic/csx-genbch-new-2001a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 105623 Nov 25 2002 generic/csx-genbch-new-2001b
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 103678 Nov 25 2002 generic/csx-genbch-new-2001c
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 205184 Jan 28 10:48 generic/csx-genbch-new-2002
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 107545 Jan 22 01:51 generic/csx-genbch-new-2002a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 97639 Jan 22 01:51 generic/csx-genbch-new-2002b
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 89498 Nov 25 2002 generic/csx-genbnu-new-2000
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 82689 Nov 25 2002 generic/csx-genbnu-new-2001a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 82740 Nov 25 2002 generic/csx-genbnu-new-2001b
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 73515 Nov 25 2002 generic/csx-genbnu-new-2001c
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 205898 Jan 22 01:51 generic/csx-genbnu-new-2002
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 105221 Jan 28 10:48 generic/csx-genbnu-new-2002a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 100677 Jan 28 10:48 generic/csx-genbnu-new-2002b
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 62009 Mar 28 10:27 generic/csx-marbch-new-2000
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 159379 Mar 28 10:27 generic/csx-marbch-new-2001
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 79891 Mar 28 10:59 generic/csx-marbch-new-2001a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 79488 Mar 28 10:59 generic/csx-marbch-new-2001b
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 193064 Mar 28 10:27 generic/csx-marbch-new-2002
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 96229 Mar 28 11:03 generic/csx-marbch-new-2002a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 96835 Mar 28 11:03 generic/csx-marbch-new-2002b
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 52081 Mar 28 10:27 generic/csx-marbnu-new-2000
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 57767 Mar 28 10:27 generic/csx-marbnu-new-2001
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 198184 Mar 28 10:27 generic/csx-marbnu-new-2002
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 97601 Mar 28 11:01 generic/csx-marbnu-new-2002a
-rw-r--r-- 1 ursl ec 100583 Mar 28 11:01 generic/csx-marbnu-new-2002b
-> 17 BCH and 15 BNU chains
The difference is for BCH 5 chains
generic/csx-marbch-new-2001
generic/csx-genbch-new-2002
generic/csx-marbch-new-2002
generic/csx-marbch-new-2002a
generic/csx-marbch-new-2002b
and for BNU 2 chains
generic/csx-genbnu-new-2002
generic/csx-marbnu-new-2002
The chains without "a" or "b" are just the ones that have been split,
the ones with "a" and "b" are the two chains I forgot.
** If I am not wrong, CVS cannot cope with symlinks. Therefore I have
** added a new directory to chains:
**
** VubAnalysis/chains/gen/.
**
** that contains all the chains that I should have included. I have added
**
** generic/csx-marbch-new-2002a
** generic/csx-marbch-new-2002b
**
** as
**
** gen/csx-genbch-new-2002d
** gen/csx-genbch-new-2002e
So much for the chains. If you like, I can try to run on the gen
directory directly (minus the forgotten ones) to see whether p00 is
reproducible.
** I then discovered why my p17 repeat of p00 did not reproduce it. I
** had reverted in ~ursl/root/fil/mergeQA to some previous version of
** the chains, so I was missing rootfiles in the merged rootfiles. I
** am currently remerging and will be fitting shortly. So I have not
** yet forgotten about the mail I sent on Friday. This would explain,
** why I did not see any difference at all in the logfiles, but the
** fit nevertheless did not produce the same result ...
**
** As of this morning, I can reproduce p00 also after the fit, so
** "everything" is understood.
** I would propose to include in the future the two forgotten chains
** for B+, even though means that the default is not exactly
** reproducible. (This is obviously only for runs not based on p00 as
** default, for the systematics rerunning I am using the identical
** setup as for p00.)
Cheers,
--U.
|
