Hoi,
as a quick check I looked at the chi2 for the fits with CLEO's
settings:
lBar l1 chi2
-------------------------------
0.480, -0.30, 5.658 // default
0.545, -0.34, 5.596 // 00
0.781, -1.13, 7.944 // 01
0.475, -0.13, 5.943 // 02
0.425, -0.12, 5.330 // 03
0.435, -0.16, 6.690 // 04
0.495, -0.34, 5.901 // 05
0.495, -0.16, 5.429 // 06
0.545, -0.47, 6.068 // 07
0.545, -0.26, 4.509 // 08
0.59, -0.62, 6.604 // 09
0.59, -0.34, 5.114 // 10
0.70, -0.95, 7.791 // 11
0.70, -0.69, 6.410 // 12
0.75, -1.08, 7.799 // 13
0.75, -0.95, 7.419 // 14
0.80, -1.2, 8.593 // 15
For illustration, you can see the same here
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/061603/chi2.eps.gz
Remember, this is all nonresonant MC only. We clearly get
significantly worse chi2 when going "down" in lambda1.
Cheers,
--U.
|