Hi Kerstin,
no I don't think so, at this moment it should be sufficient.
If I'll found something different I'll write to you..
cheers
Vir
>
> Virginia, should anything else be changed in the code apart from
> commenting out what comes behind
> "//Star vub non-resonantspecific part"?
> I did not see another place yet that needed changes for this.
>
> I will give the numbers which I found here:
>
> *** default
> BRBR 0.0219666 0.00234676 0.000873771
> Eps_Cut = 0.775344 +- 0.00854322
> Eps_tot = 0.248835 +- 0.00501357
>
> *** nonres
> BRBR 0.0220791 0.00236418 0.00104411
> Eps_Cut = 0.777663 +- 0.0137036
> Eps_tot = 0.247003 +- 0.00801005
>
> *** hybrid
> BRBR 0.0196832 0.00210833 0.000834273
> Eps_Cut = 0.803137 +- 0.0103391
> Eps_tot = 0.276976 +- 0.00683329
>
> This does look better than yesterday, though not like 3% for the hybrid.
>
> Here is the plot for the signal mc:
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~kerstin/vubchop_onevubcomp.eps
>
> Kerstin
>
|