Hi Urs,
I finally managed to read the proofs.
I found 2 mistakes on their sides and a couple of inconsistencies from our
side.


1) abstract:
	- 89 10^9 -> 89 10^6 (somehow they got confused between million
and billion ...)
	- we use a notation for the errors which is inconsistent with the
text. In the text we use subscripts to indicate stat and syst errors,
while in the abstract we use the parenthesis

2) PAC numbers are different  wrt what we indicated (13.20 He and 14.40 Nd
instead of 13.25 Hw). Can someone confirm the new ones are correct?

3) page 4 last line of the first column and first line of the second one.
We specify Breco -> Dbar Y+/-, but if we indicated Dbar we should have
only Y+ (Y- is not allowed with Dbar). The sentence would then read '...
the system Y+ consists of hadrons with total charge +1 ...)

4) page 5 first column. In the equation of Ru e_mx should be e_mx^u

5) page  6 second paragraph of the first column. The backgrounds are named
B->Dlnu, but we have been so picky so far with bars that we should use the
same notation as in page 4, Dbar-> Dlnubar,D8lnubar ...


	please let me know when you are planning to upload it, there is
still a small authorlist problem under discussion

	ciao
	ric

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Urs Langenegger wrote:

>
> Hoi,
>
> the proof for the mX prl is in. Please have a very careful look at
>
>   http://babar-hn.slac.stanford.edu:5090/hn/aux/ursl/note582/LG9660-1.pdf
>   http://babar-hn.slac.stanford.edu:5090/hn/aux/ursl/note582/LG9660-1.ps.gz
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
>
>
>