I am not sure, but I would think that this overestimates the effect.
I would think that the probability to _miss_ a 100MeV photon is ony given by
the probability to miss-reconstruct its energy below your lower cut value.
Cheers, Rolf
On Friday 18 June 2004 13:39, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> Hi Urs,
>
> the idea is to use the pi0 recipe. I don't
> think we have something better for the time
> being ...
>
>
> Heiko
>
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Urs Langenegger wrote:
> > Hoi Kerstin,
> >
> > > why in the BAD 540 analysis the uncertainty coming from neutral
> > > efficiency has not been included as a contribution to the
> > > systematic uncertainty?
> >
> > Is there a recipe for the inefficiency for single photons? I know of
> > one for pi0, but not for photons.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --U.
--
contacts: http://www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/~dubitzky
|