LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for XROOTD-L Archives


XROOTD-L Archives

XROOTD-L Archives


XROOTD-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

XROOTD-L Home

XROOTD-L Home

XROOTD-L  December 2004

XROOTD-L December 2004

Subject:

Exploring writing with xrootd

From:

Alvise Dorigo <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

16 Dec 2004 17:45:06 +0100Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:45:06 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (104 lines)

Hi Andy;
I'm doing many writing tests with xrootd (and my java client) and
I realized there's a strange behaviour of the server that I do not fully 
understand:
suppose that I do a brutal  ethernet cable unplug during a data recv at 
the client side (this can simulate a serious kernel crash in which the 
TCP stack "disappears").
What I see is that the xrootd server doesn't realize the client 
disconnection... Indeed, the client didn't disconnect at all. But as we 
know the architecture defines a fault tolerance even for socket 
read/write timeouts generated by serious cataclysm like this. And my 
client does exactly that closing the physical connection that timed out 
and creating a new one. When I plug back the ethernet cable in the 
computer it seems that xrootd doesn't detect, for a while, that the old 
physical connection is actually closed (it seems that the TCP closure 
handshake do not occur anymore...), while the new physical connection 
succesfully connects to xrootd.

Then when the client tries to re-open the file in "UPDATE" mode it 
receives a "kXR_FileLocked" error. It is right and expected to me, 
because the missing "disconnection" notification to the server didn't 
trigger any closure of the remote file.
In fact after a "normal" client crash xrootd detects the client  
disconnection and logs it with the well-known message

041216 17:29:11 20099 XrdLink: anon.0:11@nbgrid01 disconnected after 
0:00:02 (link read error)
041216 17:29:11 20099 anon.0:11@nbgrid01 XrootdFile: closing r 
/data/dorigoa/testfile.tar
041216 17:29:11 20099 anon.0:11@nbgrid01 XrootdFile: closing w 
/data/dorigoa/testfile_copy.tar.1103214553901

In the case described above a message like this message isn't fired out, 
and files remain open.

Then I did think that I could resolve this by sending an explicit close 
command (kXR_close); but xrootd refuses to execute the command saying: 
"close does not refer to an open file" and I'm sure that command is 
trying to close the right filehandle (I made many cross-check with the 
client and server log files). Please read the log in the following:

041216 16:04:10 19906 anon.0:11@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0001 fh=1 write 
2000000@2000000
041216 16:04:10 19906 anon.0:11@nbgrid01 XrootdResponse: 0001 sending OK
041216 16:04:15 19906 anon.0:11@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0001 request 
timeout; read 0 of 24 bytes
041216 16:04:15 19906 anon.0:11@nbgrid01 XrdPoll: sending poller 0 
enable for link 11
041216 16:04:15 19906 XrdPoll: Poller 0 enabled fd 11 entry 1 now at 2
041216 16:04:32 19906 XrdInet: Accepted connection from nbgrid01
041216 16:04:32 19906 XrdSched: running 4@nbgrid01 inq=0
041216 16:04:32 19906 XrdProtocol: matched protocol daemon
041216 16:04:32 19906 ?:14@nbgrid01 XrdPoll: FD 14 attached to poller 1; 
num=1
041216 16:04:32 19906 ?:14@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0000 req=3007 dlen=0
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdResponse: 0000 sending OK
041216 16:04:32 19906 XrootdXeq: User logged in as anon.0:14@nbgrid01
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0000 req=3003 
dlen=0
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdResponse: 0000 sending 
err 3004: close does not refer to an open file
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0000 req=3010 
dlen=26
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0000 open r 
/data/dorigoa/testfile.tar fh=0
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdResponse: 0000 sending 4 
data bytes; rc=0
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0000 req=3013 
dlen=0
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0000 fh=0 read 0@0
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdResponse: 0000 sending OK
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0001 req=3003 
dlen=0
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdResponse: 0001 sending 
err 3004: close does not refer to an open file
041216 16:04:32 19906 anon.0:14@nbgrid01 XrootdProtocol: 0001 req=3010 
dlen=45
041216 16:04:32 19906 XrootdXeq: Output file 
/data/dorigoa/testfile_copy.tar.1103209452144 is already opened by 1 
writer; open denied.


As you can see there's a time gap between 16:04:15 and 16:04:32; in fact 
at 16:04:15 I unplugged the ethernet cable and plugged back in at 
16:04:32. Then you can see xrootd accepts a new connection but do not 
detect any disconnection; and the file 
/data/dorigoa/testfile_copy.tar.1103209452144 remains open.

Now I think this is not a bug in the code of course, it is something 
related to the architecture and I would like to hear some comment from 
you...

[ I could do a workaround by remembering old physical connections that 
timed out and retry to close them before starting any other 
communication but after a new physical tcp channel succesfully 
conntected to xrootd (i.e. after I'm sure the ethernet link is UP); but 
it sounds too much tricky to me... ]

thanks and sorry for the long email... ;)

    Alvise


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use