Hi all,
in VirVubFitter we have been using RecoilAnalysis/recoilDSys, but we
also did (more than 1 year ago) detailed checks with
VubAnalysis/recoilDSys, which I believe gave consistent results.
At the moment we cannot check the details in our logbooks (both Virginia
and I are not in Ferrara), we'll do that on Monday.
Ciao, Concezio.
Daniele del Re wrote:
>>yes, in principle you are right. However, VubAnalysis/fitNtp.cc
>>includes the other version (the one in VubAnalysis). So it would be
>>nice to have THE person to know sign off with a better CL than "I
>>presume". Are the differences between the two versions understood?
>>
>>
>
>VirVubFitter results were consistent with the fitNtp ones (right
>Virginia) and fitNtp is not used since ages.
>
>This is what I know. I am noticing that the VubAnalysis version was the
>result of the migration done by Ed. Probably Ed himself knows if there was
>an original large difference between the two. After the first commit there
>have been just two versions with fixes by Kerstin and Concezio.
>
> Daniele
>
>
>
>
|