Hi Bob,
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Heiko Lacker wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > to get something preliminary out for Moriond QCD we need to go into
> > collaboration wide review on February the 18th.
> >
> > I think we need to go to the RC at latest beginning of February. In
> > other words we need to have the sign-off from the AWG at the end of
> > January, e.g. 31st of January. That is, the documentation must be
> > ready well in advance, let's say a week, e.g. 24th of January.
> >
> > Does this tentative timeline make sense?
>
> Yes, it makes sense, and it's very tight. We need to evaluate by mid-
> January which recoil analyses (if any) will make it. If it looks like
> some or all will not, then we might be better off putting the effort into
> updating the interpretation of the Run 1-2 recoil results with an eye
> toward showing an up to date (using the new Neubert calculation if
> possible and the updated numbers from Bauer-Ligeti-Luke for q2-Mx) BaBar
> Vub average at CKM2005.
Do you have already any news concerning the new Neubert calculation
and updated numbers from Bauer-Ligeti-Luke for q2-Mx?
Heiko
> Bob
>
> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////
> / Robert V. Kowalewski \/ Dept. of Physics and Astronomy \
> \ particle.phys.uvic.ca/~kowalews /\ University of Victoria /
> / Tel: (250)721-7705 \/ P.O. Box 3055 \
> \ Email: [log in to unmask] /\ Victoria, BC V8W 3P6 /
> /////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
>
|