Hi Virginia,


> Hi Kerstin and Heiko,
> i apologize for the delay.
>
> > > I checked if what we see on the unfolded spectrum and the PBRBR Virginia
> > > showed this morning are consistent.
> > >
> > > >From the numbers on Virginia's page I find
> > > PBRBR/BRBR = 0.64 +- 0.12 (stat and MC stat error added in quadrature).
>
> I've checked my numbers and I think i disagree with you for what
> concern the error above, because to calculate the BRBR I get through this
> formula:
>
> BRBR = PBRBR/eps phsp
>
> so if you look at my web page you'll see that it results in 0.641 +-
> 0.002 (for DFN).
> can you please explain me in more details why you evaluate in this way?

You are right, my numbers are wrong. I apologize for not checking more
carefully.
I have a question concerning how you find eps phsp: Is it based on signal
MC (and if yes, on which) or does something else enter?

Thanks,
Kerstin


> > Virginia: do you know by how much this result
> > changes when changing mb and a within the
> > CLEO or Belle SF parameter uncertainties?
>
> approximately
> cleo: 20 %
> belle: 10 %
>
> cheers
> Virginia
>
> > Cheers,
> > Heiko
> >
> > >
> > > The comparison of the 2- and the 3-parameter fit (for the mX spectrum)
> > > which we mentioned this morning can be found on slide 10 of the talk
> > > linked from here:
> > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Organization/CollabMtgs/2004/detMay04/Thur1b/Thur1b.html
> > >
> > > First of all, the 3-parameter fit converged and it seemed to have slightly
> > > less negative entries in the high mX region than the 2-parameter fit.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Kerstin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Virginia Azzolini wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > hi,
> > > >
> > > > you can find an update about  fit validation of the 1d mx unfolding  at:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~azzolini/validation-mxUnfold/validation-mxUnfolded.html
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > > Virginia
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >  .*.    Two atoms bump into each other.
> > > >  /V\    One says 'I think I lost an electron!'
> > > > (/ \)   The other asks, 'Are you sure?',
> > > > (   )	to which the first replies, 'I'm positive.'
> > > > ^^-^^ -----------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > here are the coordinates for tomorrow.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Heiko
> > > > >
> > > > > >Hi Heiko,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Here is the information and confirmation for your conference call
> > > > > >tomorrow
> > > > > >at 9 am
> > > > > >(Since you did not specify a length of time or lines needed ) I have
> > > > > >scheduled the
> > > > > >length of time as for 1.5 hrs, with 8 lines. Will this be okay?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >A Meeting Place conference has been scheduled.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Call: 510-665-5437
> > > > > >
> > > > > >When: February 17, 2005, 09:00 AM America/Los_Angeles
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Meeting ID: 6992
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Regards,
> > > > > >Donna
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>