Hi all,
I have updated the table in
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~sacco/efficiency/eff.html
with some of Daniele's suggestions. I'm still working on the old
production with no killing nor neutral smearing.
All the best,
Roberto
>
> Ciao Roberto,
>
> this page is very nice and helpful.
>
> Few comments:
>
> - lepton ID looks different but it should be somehow expected since we
> are not doing any killing
> - there is something really wrong with q2 that should be fixed in the
> code
> - mm2 for B0 looks suspicious
> - track selection looks less efficient
>
> Then lepton ID and q2 distributions probably explain half of the
> discrepancy.
>
> I propose three other checks:
>
> 1) recalculate the eff numbers with no cut on q2 and nle
> 2) rerun the old signal production with no killing and no neutral
> smearing at all and compare again
> 3) recalculate the table with a tight cut on the purity, i.e. intpur>0.5
> (here you are not fitting mes and the different combinatorics between the old and new
> Beta production can play a role).
>
> Daniele
>
|