LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  June 2005

VUB-RECOIL June 2005

Subject:

Re: ssbar popping and hadronisation systematics

From:

Edward Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

8 Jun 2005 08:19:07 -0700Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:19:07 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (33 lines)

On Wednesday 08 June 2005 12:12 am, Wolfgang Menges wrote:
> I also got a few hints for the hadronisation systematic from Ed. This
> includes taking the right reweighting file and the right first mx bin. We
> are using 1.4 GeV, aren't we? The main point is that we have to adjust the
> exclusive BFs in wfermifile.dat and then recompute the scaling factor for
> the non-resonant part to have the right total BF.
>
> This applies also to the systematic studies for the variation of the
> exclusive BFs.
>
> I think the corrections factor should be (I left my notes in the office)
>
>        N_h          BF_new
>    k = ---- * ----------------
>        N_r    BF_res+BF_nonres
>
> Concezio, you should know this. Is this formular correct. Do you still
> have the numbers?

For hadronization, the weight for the non-res will be the same as the default 
setup - you just need to use the proper weightfile from Dominique.  For the 
exclusive mode studies, this weight (factor k above) will need to be 
recomputed along with using the proper weightfile from Dom.  The numbers N_h, 
N_r, and (BF^SP_res+BF^SP_nonres) will all be fixed - only BF^NEW_nonres (i 
think that's the number - i don't have my notes in front of me right now) 
will be different when varying exclusive BFs.  Whoever computed the CM2 
weights should know those numbers and can give them to Wolfgang.

Cheers,
Ed


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use