>> By the way... from the name it looks like I have the debugger (or does the
>> _dbg suffix mean something else)?
> Yes and no. It appears that the rpm process strips away the debugging
> symbols and places themin a separate rpm. How to use that is beyond me. So
> while the executable says it has debugging symbols (because it was
> compiled that way); rpm undoes it all, sigh.
I am using the binary package and not the rpm.