LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for XROOTD-L Archives


XROOTD-L Archives

XROOTD-L Archives


XROOTD-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

XROOTD-L Home

XROOTD-L Home

XROOTD-L  December 2005

XROOTD-L December 2005

Subject:

Re: HandShake problem in Xoortd

From:

Fabrizio Furano <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

14 Dec 2005 01:21:56 +0100Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:21:56 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (92 lines)

Hi,

  I just checked the code in ROOT  4.04-02, just to realize that the 
retry code is there. It should work.

  In fact, even from your plain error log, it seems that the client 
already tries more than once to connect/handshake/disconnect.

  A log with level 2 would be more descriptive. However, all you can do 
is to play with the parameter:

XNet.TryConnectServersList

  This is the max number of "first connect" failures before TXNetFile 
gives up.

  What I don't understand is that you should already see about 240 
retries, since 240 is the default value (about 2400 seconds). Do you see 
so many messages before the failure?

  Note: Making the client retry for hours or days will not solve the 
basic problem, i.e. the unresponsive server. So you cannot be guaranteed 
that you are not simply moving the problem. I don't know if this is 
preferable to having an aborted job.

Fabrizio

Jerome LAURET wrote:
> 
>     Yes, it may be an unresponsive server but the end
> product is a user job crashing according to our users. Some
> of those connections (later retried) would lead to success.
> We can switch to level 3 and see as soon as we can design a
> large scale test: we also have flukes with authentication
> in general I have not reported this yet (I beleive it to be
> LDAP related as changing the LDAP setup changed failure rates
> from 50% to 3% ... but I cannot drop below the 3% failures).
> 
>     In general, could someone indicates what is the most
> reliable setting for Xrootd to retry upon failures (regardless
> of delays this may cause) ??
> 
>     Thanks,
> 
> Fabrizio Furano wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jerome.
>>
>>  This almost never happens, and makes me think about an unresponsive 
>> server. But may be caused by weird connection troubles. Do you get 
>> this immediately or in the middle of a communication?
>>
>>  Since it's a very strance situation, I'd suggest you to put the 
>> client side debug level to 3 and send everything to me. Also the 
>> server side log (after having enabled it, of course) will be useful.
>>
>>  The version included in root4 is rather old, but well known and 
>> tested. I am looking forward hoping that everybody will be switching 
>> to the newer one asap.... at least I will be no more dealing with N 
>> versions of the same code....
>>
>> Fabrizio
>>
>>
>>
>> Jerome LAURET wrote:
>>
>>>     Has anyone experienced this kind of issues and if so, what
>>> to do to resolve it ??
>>>
>>>> Error in <DoHandShake>: Error reading 4 bytes from the server 
>>>> [rcas6132.rcf.bnl.gov:1095].
>>>> Info in <GetAccessToSrv>: HandShake failed with server 
>>>> [rcas6132.rcf.bnl.gov:1095].
>>>> Error in <TXNetFile::CreateTXNf>: Access to server failed (0)
>>>> Error in <Disconnect>: Destroying nonexistent logconnid 0.
>>>> Error in <DoHandShake>: Error reading 4 bytes from the server 
>>>> [rcas6132.rcf.bnl.gov:1095].
>>>> Info in <GetAccessToSrv>: HandShake failed with server 
>>>> [rcas6132.rcf.bnl.gov:1095].
>>>> Error in <TXNetFile::CreateTXNf>: Access to server failed (0)
>>>> Error in <Disconnect>: Destroying nonexistent logconnid 0. 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Thank you,
>>>
> 


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use