LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  February 2006

VUB-RECOIL February 2006

Subject:

Question about mes fits

From:

Sheila Mclachlin <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

12 Feb 2006 16:06:21 -0500 (EST)Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:06:21 -0500 (EST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (48 lines)


Hello,

I have a question.  In VubRecoil studies, 
like the one in BAD 540, one of the things they 
do is measure the spectra of variables like 
mX and pl.  So in order to remove the breco 
background, they have to sort the events into 
bins of mX or pl, and perform a separate mes fit 
in each bin.

Specifically, for the mX fit, the Crystal Ball 
parameters are determined from a fit to the full 
sample, and fixed in the bin-by-bin fits.  
The Argus parameters are floated in the bin-by-bin fits.  

* for background, mes varies so much with mX or pl that is is worth 
the loss of statistics (from the binning) to determine 
the breco background bin-by-bin.

* for signal, mes does not vary enough with mX or pl to make it 
worthwhile to bin the data and incur the loss of statistics.
OR
* for signal, we do not have enough faith in the Crystal Ball 
function to trust it in a bin-by-bin fit.
OR BOTH.

So my questions are:

* Is my interpretation correct?
* If so, then WHY would mes background vary so much with mX or pl?  
I can see how mes might vary with the QUALITY of mX, since 
a badly-reco'd reco-B meson would lead to a badly-reco'd X.  
But ultimately the two B mesons decay independently, so I don't 
see why mes should affect the mX or pl distributions very much.  
And yet they must, or there would be no need for a bin-by-bin 
fit.

I hope that's not a stupid question. 
I'm still kind of new to this stuff.

Thanks for your help,

sheila



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use