I have so far as numbers:
Concezio: +39 3491491984
Wolfgang: +44 20 7882 3753
Antonio: +39 0532 974333
Francesca: ?
Sheila showed also interest.
Heiko
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry, it seems that I cannot set up this conference system...
>
> Antonio
>
>
> Antonio Petrella ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> > from my office I can't call more than 1 phone, moreover I've never
> > used the conference system you're talking about.
> > I try to see if I get some informations about it.
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > Wolfgang Menges ha scritto:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I can't call anybody. Antonio, can you call more than one or can
> >> you set up the italian conference system?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Wolfgang
> >>
> >> On Sun, 21 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have just returned from a trip and learnt that two members of my
> >>> family have to go to medical doctors tomorrow. As a consequence,
> >>> it is not guaranteed that I'm able to attend at noon.
> >>>
> >>> Nevertheless, we should not postpone the meeting.
> >>> Concezio has sent me his mobile phone number: +39 349 149 1984
> >>>
> >>> I hope that someone from you is able to call the others or to
> >>> organize a phone conference on its own. E.g. there is an italian
> >>> phone conference system which we have been using the past.
> >>>
> >>> Heiko
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I forgot to mention that the particpants agreed
> >>>> on a phone meeting on Monday, noon, European time.
> >>>> I'll call them. If there other intersted parties
> >>>> let me know. Then it might be easier to have a
> >>>> phone conference.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Heiko
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> here is a short summary of the phone meeting.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Participants: Wolfgang, Antonio, Concezio, Heiko
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * We observe a 3.7% bias for signal in the full MC fit.
> >>>>> * The Argus parameters found in the full MC fit and in the
> >>>>> fit of combinatoric+peaking BG including non-BBbar events
> >>>>> are different.
> >>>>> * The peaking BG yield for the combinatoric+peaking BG fit
> >>>>> is different between using only BBbar or BBbar+non-BBbar.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Since we do not know how to fix the peaking BG yield in the
> >>>>> fit on data we decide to freeze our fit configuration as it
> >>>>> is and will determine with extreme choices how the ratio of
> >>>>> BR is influenced.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nevertheless Antonio will go on to understand further what's
> >>>>> going on:
> >>>>> 1) Repeat the full MC fit with the ARGUS parameter fixed to
> >>>>> the one found on the fit in combinatoric+peaking BG including
> >>>>> non-BBbar events
> >>>>> We should then find a signal yield in much better agreement
> >>>>> with the expected yield.
> >>>>> 2) Perform a fit with all cuts applied.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Wolfgang:
> >>>>> 1) Provide a VVF-tag by today
> >>>>> 2) Fix p* problem (hopefully until tomorrow)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Chukwudi would the supposed to perform the mm2 scans tomorrow
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Heiko: Inform the convenors about the status.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Heiko
> >>>>>
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Wolfgang Menges
> >> Queen Mary, University of London SLAC, MS 35
> >> Mile End Road 2575 Sand Hill Road
> >> London, E1 4NS, UK Menlo Park, CA 94025,
> >> USA
> >> ++44 20 7882 3753 ++1 650 926 8503
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >
>
|