I'm at (650) 926-8566.
sheila
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm back. Please send me your numbers.
>
> Heiko
>
> On Mon, 22 May 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > from my office I can't call more than 1 phone, moreover I've never used
> > the conference system you're talking about.
> > I try to see if I get some informations about it.
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > Wolfgang Menges ha scritto:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I can't call anybody. Antonio, can you call more than one or can
> > > you set up the italian conference system?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Wolfgang
> > >
> > > On Sun, 21 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I have just returned from a trip and learnt that two members of my
> > >> family have to go to medical doctors tomorrow. As a consequence,
> > >> it is not guaranteed that I'm able to attend at noon.
> > >>
> > >> Nevertheless, we should not postpone the meeting.
> > >> Concezio has sent me his mobile phone number: +39 349 149 1984
> > >>
> > >> I hope that someone from you is able to call the others or to
> > >> organize a phone conference on its own. E.g. there is an italian
> > >> phone conference system which we have been using the past.
> > >>
> > >> Heiko
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> I forgot to mention that the particpants agreed
> > >>> on a phone meeting on Monday, noon, European time.
> > >>> I'll call them. If there other intersted parties
> > >>> let me know. Then it might be easier to have a
> > >>> phone conference.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Heiko
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> here is a short summary of the phone meeting.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Participants: Wolfgang, Antonio, Concezio, Heiko
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * We observe a 3.7% bias for signal in the full MC fit.
> > >>>> * The Argus parameters found in the full MC fit and in the
> > >>>> fit of combinatoric+peaking BG including non-BBbar events
> > >>>> are different.
> > >>>> * The peaking BG yield for the combinatoric+peaking BG fit
> > >>>> is different between using only BBbar or BBbar+non-BBbar.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Since we do not know how to fix the peaking BG yield in the
> > >>>> fit on data we decide to freeze our fit configuration as it
> > >>>> is and will determine with extreme choices how the ratio of
> > >>>> BR is influenced.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Nevertheless Antonio will go on to understand further what's
> > >>>> going on:
> > >>>> 1) Repeat the full MC fit with the ARGUS parameter fixed to
> > >>>> the one found on the fit in combinatoric+peaking BG including
> > >>>> non-BBbar events
> > >>>> We should then find a signal yield in much better agreement
> > >>>> with the expected yield.
> > >>>> 2) Perform a fit with all cuts applied.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Wolfgang:
> > >>>> 1) Provide a VVF-tag by today
> > >>>> 2) Fix p* problem (hopefully until tomorrow)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Chukwudi would the supposed to perform the mm2 scans tomorrow
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Heiko: Inform the convenors about the status.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>> Heiko
> > >>>>
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Wolfgang Menges
> > > Queen Mary, University of London SLAC, MS 35
> > > Mile End Road 2575 Sand Hill Road
> > > London, E1 4NS, UK Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
> > > ++44 20 7882 3753 ++1 650 926 8503
> > > [log in to unmask]
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
|