VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Riccardo Faccini <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
22 Nov 2001 04:26:08 -0800 (PST)Thu, 22 Nov 2001 04:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (41 lines)
I think it is useful (and 100K is the order of magnitude of the
sp4 request that is intended).
I think we should make the SP4 request anyhow, though.
	thanks
	ric
P.S. Daniele, can you evaluate the effective Xsection of the dec file?


On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 [log in to unmask] wrote:

> Hi,
> should we make a quick SP3/8.8.1b production at the INFN farm? The
> technicalities are already set up and I could start with e.g. 100K events. We
> would have them in a few days. What do you think?
> Ciao, Concezio.
>
> Daniele del Re wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  I committed two new .dec files for Vub signal MC:
> >
> >  ProdDecayFiles//BB_BrecoCocktail_Xulnu.dec       for mix
> >  ProdDecayFiles//BB_BrecoCocktail_Xulnu_VUB.dec   for not-res
> >
> >  They generate B0/+ with a B->Xulnu on one side and a Breco Cocktail on
> > the other. I changed a bit the official .dec for Breco cocktail in order
> > to include all the B decay modes present in the DECAY.dec that we are able
> > to reconstruct. Moreover I added three decay modes of the charged D
> > not present (Dc->k2pipi0, Dc->kspipi0, Dc->ks3pi) since we are
> > reconstructing them.
> >
> >  I tested the files and they seem to work fine.
> >
> >  Daniele
>
>




ATOM RSS1 RSS2