Hi,
it seems to me that this D** bug was actually due to an inconsitency
when producing the dataset files.
So here is how I proceeded:
- computed the D**+other ratio performing a 3 parameters mx fit (=
0.4286+-0.1249).
- produced dataset with this ratio fixed.
- computed the S/P ratio for IP > 0.20
now I was running the systematics due to S/P for this IP cut...
I have a question: do I need to reproduce the D**+other ratio for each
IP cuts (and also datasets for fittest) or can I use the above and just
cutting on IP when computing S/P?
Antonio
Heiko Lacker ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I have not heard any status report since the beginning of the week.
> It would be good to understand where we stand.
>
> Heiko
>
|