Hi Francesca,
thanks. There are also some (minor) differences in the exclusive BF with
respect to what we were using so far, e.g. the rho BFs. I guess this is
because the numbers were taken directly from the SP8 generation values.
We took from SP8 also the values for the inclusive BFs - 0.001892 for
B+->Xulnu, 0.001948 for B0->Xulnu - which you updated to 0.002304 and
0.002220 respectively.
Another difference regards m_b (4.62 -> 4.6586) and a(2.27 -> 1.32669).
Could you clarify this?
Thanks, ciao, Concezio.
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: [log in to unmask] [mailto:owner-vub-
> [log in to unmask]] Per conto di Francesca Di Lodovico
> Inviato: luned́ 11 giugno 2007 10.17
> A: [log in to unmask]
> Oggetto: new weights
>
> Hi, the file with the new weights (for the main configuration) can be
> found in:
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/%7Elodovico/protected/vub/weights/weightsB/ne
> w_weightfile_ellipse1_w1_exp_B.txt
>
> The only difference with respect to before is in the pi(0)lnu final
> state. The BF's correspond to the PDG 07 value (ie based on all the
> published measurements). The other BF's are the same then before, as there
> isn't any new published measurement since then.
>
> During this week, I will produce the weight files also for the
> configurations related to the systematics.
>
> Cheers,
> Francesca
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary, University of London |
> | E-mail:[log in to unmask] Physics Department |
> | Phone: +44-(0)20-7882-5035 Mile End Road |
> | Fax: +44-(0)20-8981-9465 London E1 4NS, UK |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
|