LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for XROOTD-L Archives


XROOTD-L Archives

XROOTD-L Archives


XROOTD-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

XROOTD-L Home

XROOTD-L Home

XROOTD-L  December 2007

XROOTD-L December 2007

Subject:

Re: Autotools install

From:

Fabrizio Furano <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

13 Dec 2007 16:25:15 +0100Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:25:15 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (157 lines)

Hi Derek,

  I appreciate your responsiveness, but I don't want to steer into 
philosophical talks. Maybe ZX spectrum was better than C=64, but I don't 
care now.

  The point is that there are tenths of sites (with many different 
architectures, and not only babarians) using the plain classic build and 
the rpms that Wilko provides.
  So, from my perspective, I just see that if I try to use the autotools build:

- as a developer i don't feel comfortable with it. For instance, I don't 
want to choose if to look at the libraries in a hidden directory or being 
forced to install everything in /usr/, or having to look at the executables 
in N different places.
- if I want to setup a cluster, or even a single server, I have no clue at 
all about how to start it, since the bundled scripts (used by a lot of 
people) do not work.
- I don't want to mess up things and write shell scripts on top of 
something just to start my own executables (btw this is what Alien seems to 
do, workarounds over workarounds). It should just work out of the box, like 
in the classic case.


  Given this, which I think is pretty pragmatic, I'd like to be even more 
pragmatic. Since this morning I am fighting to install a manager with a 
trivial config file, with no success. This makes me quite upset. I am not 
able to deal with my own stuff.
  I switched back to configure.classic and it works. So, I have no idea of 
what's good or bad, but please, if you have a clean list of hints/fixes to 
do, my wish is to work together and put the 'alternate' build system in a 
state where it is usable and it does not need workarounds.
  For how it is now, if I have to setup a cluster somewhere, I will simply 
ignore it, but that's not what I'd prefer.

  I hope that I don't make you upset with this. Let's make this thing work 
together if you want.


Fabrizio

Derek Feichtinger wrote:
> Hi, Fabrizio
> 
> I'm sorry that you have so much fuzz with this.
> Some comments follow:
> 
>> So, if I keep the default prefix /usr/local, I expect to have the
>> config files in /usr/local/etc, and the libs in /usr/local/lib, but
>> what I see now is that "make install" puts that stuff into /usr/local/
>> etc/xrootd and similar for lib.
> 
> The choice for $PREFIX/etc/xrootd instead of just $PREFIX/etc was taken 
> because an administrator does not want /etc cluttered with a whole number of 
> files from a single package, so it is nicer to have it in a separate 
> directory named for the service. 
> 
> StartOLB
> StartOLB.cf.example
> StartXRD
> StartXRD.cf.example
> StopOLB
> StopXRD
> XrdOlbMonPerf
> xrootd.cf.example
> 
> I can easily build in an option, if this is a problem (hardcoded locations?). 
> But usually, one wants to have typical init scripts which fit into a system's 
> service startup and shutdown structure.
> 
> For the libraries you looked wrongly, for they are in $PREFIX/lib and not in a 
> separate folder. This would break the standard convention for libraries.
> But the include files are also segregated into $PREFIX/include/xrootd/ for 
> better structuring.
> 
>>   This is not compatible with the standard StartXRD scripts, which
>> everybody use (except Alice afaik). What do you think about this? Are
>> you aware of any workaround for that?
> 
> While I was working for ALICE, we always used custom scripts. But since xrootd 
> needs a minimum of switches and mainly relies on the config files, this never 
> seemed a drawback to me. It involved just a few lines of shell code.
> 
>> Btw in the meantime, I will
>> install my machines like I always did, i.e. with the plain
>> configure.classic, but that is not what the Alice guys are used to,
>> even if it's much simpler by now imho.
> 
> Well, configure.classic works well and is faster than the autotools build. But 
> autotools is still _the_  standard in the build system and portability world. 
> New systems like cmake are popping up, but these things are really difficult 
> and painful to develop, and they take long until a big community adopts them.
> 
> Also, if you look at a xrootd Makefile.am and then at the corresponding 
> classic GNUMakefile, the Makefile.am is structured much simpler.
> It is trivial to build RPMs and other packages from an autotools build, since 
> it correctly observes the DESTDIR setting (packaging directory), and the 
> libraries correctly contain the right -rpath, so that no LD_LIBRARY_PATH 
> needs to be set.
> Autotools configure is slower, because it makes real compilation tests for the 
> system's features. The generated configure script shows all the standard 
> behavior expected by users and offers a wide range of user options. Also, you 
> can build multiple architectures from the same sources, e.g. by having them 
> on a shared filesystem.
> 
> Configure.classic is a separate and well working system, but it has completely 
> non-standard behavior and if I want to deploy software in a standard way, I 
> have to do extra work.
> 
> The technology used by autotools to generate the configure (m4, etc.) is too 
> old and inconvenient, and some things are clearly too complex. However, since 
> so much work has been done before, you usually don't have to deal with these 
> kind of issues, and you more or less just use the ready made macros. Don't 
> forget that a large part of the complexity comes for the innate problems that 
> portability implies - years of operations systems development and complex and 
> subtle differences across their versions.
> 
> Sorry again for your losing time because of these issues, but it really was 
> hard for me in the last few weeks to pay close attention to this, and keeping 
> a separate build is not always easy.
> 
> Cheers,
> Derek
>  
> 
> 
> On Thursday 13 December 2007, Fabrizio Furano wrote:
>> Hi Derek,
>>
>>   well, I am sorry to bother you so much, but I am not able to get out
>> from this maze.
>>
>>   The problem I find is that when I make install, it puts the things
>> in a way which looks incompatible with the normal start/stop scripts,
>> which hence do not work. This may be one reason for the bloody mess of
>> alternative install/start/stop scripts that I see around.
>>
>> So, if I keep the default prefix /usr/local, I expect to have the
>> config files in /usr/local/etc, and the libs in /usr/local/lib, but
>> what I see now is that "make install" puts that stuff into /usr/local/
>> etc/xrootd and similar for lib.
>>
>>   This is not compatible with the standard StartXRD scripts, which
>> everybody use (except Alice afaik). What do you think about this? Are
>> you aware of any workaround for that? Btw in the meantime, I will
>> install my machines like I always did, i.e. with the plain
>> configure.classic, but that is not what the Alice guys are used to,
>> even if it's much simpler by now imho.
>>
>> Fabrizio Furano
>> [log in to unmask]
> 
> 
> 


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use