Hi all,
Two emails sent to the list bounced. In one case
the reason was related to the list restrictions:
the list was configured to accepted emails from
registered email addresses only, and the person
used a different email. In second case it was
a big attachment.
I realize it is inconvenient having to remember
which email address to use, so I opened up the
list: the list now accepts emails from any email
address. Hopefully we will not get too much spam,
slac has a good spam filter.
I will respond to the bounced emails so all of
you will have a chance to read them.
Sorry about the problems.
thanks,
Jacek
Jacek Becla wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It was suggested at the xldb workshop that we should
> improve collaboration between science and db research
> communities, in particular, we should try to organize
> a working group & a mini-workshop with representatives
> from different sciences and db research community to
> discuss a common set of database-related requirements
> and primitives that scientists need from next-generation
> DBMS with the goals of stimulating database research
> and eventually producing standardized benchmarks.
>
> We know from Mike's blog
> http://www.databasecolumn.com/2007/11/databases-for-big-science.html
> that the research community is still interested (great!),
> and I think science is interested too, so let's make it
> happen.
>
> I suggest we organize a _small_, focused mini-workshop
> with representatives from
> - astronomy (2-3)
> - HEP (2-3)
> - biology/medicine/neuro-science (2-3)
> - earth science (1)
> - db research (4-6)
> - plus KT and myself (organizers).
> That would be < 20 total.
>
> I do remember it was mentioned at the XLDB we might want
> to invite few selected vendors to this meeting, could
> someone explain what the thinking behind it was? I imagine
> if we pick some (true) db researchers that happen to work
> for a database vendor that might work well (maybe
> Guy Lohman? Who else?), but otherwise I think for the
> sake of keeping the meeting small and focused I'd be
> tempted to leave the vendors out this time (sorry!).
>
> I know astronomy and HEP communities relatively well,
> and I thought about inviting:
> - Robert Lupton, Alex Szalay and Kirk Borne (astro)
> - Dirk Duellmann, David Quarrie (hep)
> I will need help with identifying solid representatives
> from the remaining sciences, I'm counting on Nagiza (ORNL),
> Celeste (LLNL) and others to help us.
>
> We'll expect science representatives to prepare white
> papers in advance of the mini-workshop based on input
> and materials from their colleagues describing prioritized
> features and primitives her/his community would like
> to see in a next-generation DBMS. These white papers
> will serve as the basis for the workshop discussions.
>
> To kick off this process, we have prepared a draft
> list of potential common requirements:
>
> http://xldb.slac.stanford.edu/display/XLDB/Common+Requirements
>
> We encourage everybody from science to add to it or
> attach comments.
>
> We are proposing to meet late April or early May in
> Asilomar (as discussed at XLDB), and we believe a
> 2 day meeting would be most productive.
>
> Mike, David: I know you've organized many meetings and
> conferences at Asilomar, can we count on your help with
> arranging the logistics with Asilomar?
>
> And finally, given how severely the budget of entire
> science was hit this year, it would tremendously help
> if we would have some sponsors to offset the costs.
> Given we are not planning to have representatives from
> industry and vendors, I'm not sure what is the best
> way to attract sponsors.
>
> Anyway, please send feedbacks, comments and suggestions
> either to me or to the entire list.
>
> thanks,
> Jacek and KT
>
--
Jacek Becla
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
[log in to unmask]
+1 650 926 8664
|