Hi Kerstin,
you are right, the wrong data chains were used... I just reproduced
the plots and the web page. The agreement for CT is much better now :)
Please have a look at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~sacco/thecomparison/tracking/comparelists.html
for the updated plots.
Thanks for spotting it!
Roberto
On 20 Mar 2008, at 21:08, Kerstin Tackmann wrote:
>
> Hi Roberto,
>
> this is interesting. I have one question, though: Comparing the data
> histograms for the various variables for the different track lists,
> it looks like they are identical, i.e. the data distributions do not
> seem to change when using different track lists. This seems unlikely
> (especially as the MC histos change when changing the track list).
> Could there be have been a typo in either the data-MC comparison
> setup (causing the same data ntuples to be used for the three sets)
> or in the ntuple production (i.e. the track lists were the same for
> data)?
>
> All the best,
> Kerstin
>
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Roberto Sacco wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> to understand the effect of different track lists in input to
>> VubRecoilUser, I produced a web page with run3 data/MC comparison
>> plots side by side. You can access it here:
>> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~sacco/thecomparison/tracking/comparelists.html
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Roberto
|