Hi Everyone,
Just for fun: I ran across this abstract on the preprint server today (from
http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.0151):
> More Really is Different
> Authors: Mile Gu, Christian Weedbrook, Alvaro Perales, Michael A. Nielsen
> (Submitted on 31 Aug 2008)
>
> Abstract: In 1972, P.W.Anderson suggested that `More is Different',
> meaning that complex physical systems may exhibit behavior that cannot be
> understood only in terms of the laws governing their microscopic
> constituents. We strengthen this claim by proving that many macroscopic
> observable properties of a simple class of physical systems (the infinite
> periodic Ising lattice) cannot in general be derived from a microscopic
> description. This provides evidence that emergent behavior occurs in such
> systems, and indicates that even if a `theory of everything' governing all
> microscopic interactions were discovered, the understanding of macroscopic
> order is likely to require additional insights.
If I understand what they say, they are claiming that the usual reductionist
view of physics (take everything apart into its fundamental constituents,
find out how they work, then you know everything there is to know) is
wrong. Do you get the same impression? Or are they saying something less
weird?
Thanks,
--Ray
|