LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for LQS-L Archives


LQS-L Archives

LQS-L Archives


LQS-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LQS-L Home

LQS-L Home

LQS-L  March 2010

LQS-L March 2010

Subject:

3.5 TeV : Patience pays dividends (fwd)

From:

Frank Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

19 Mar 2010 06:14:47 -0400 (EDT)Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:14:47 -0400 (EDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (89 lines)

Dear All,

Please see the good news - you may not have heard. 

Best regards,

        Frank

	Frank E. Taylor

        CERN                                      MIT 
        ATLAS Collaboration                       Bldg. 26 - Rm 569
        188-3-015                                 77 Mass. Ave.
        Route de Meyrin 385, CH-1211 Geneva 23    Cambridge, MA 02139
        Switzerland                               USA
        Office: +41-22-767-6373                   Office: 617-253-7249
        FAX: +41-22-767-8350                      FAX: 617-258-6923

        CELL:  781-484-8776 (USA & Europe) CERN CELL +41 76 487 3563
        email: [log in to unmask]
        web:   http://www2.lns.mit.edu/~fet/atlas_mit.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:34:23 +0100
From: Rolf Heuer <[log in to unmask]>
To: "cern-personnel (CERN Personnel - Members and Associate Members)"
    <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: 3.5 TeV : Patience pays dividends

French version will follow - La version française suivra
**********************************

In my message this week, I'd like to congratulate the LHC team in
accelerating two beams to 3.5 TeV in the early hours of this morning. The
timing could not have been better. Coming during a week of CERN Council
meetings, it allowed us to show delegates the great progress we're making.
The occasion also gave us the opportunity to set out again the prudent
step-by-step approach that we're taking to get the LHC up and running, and
it was refreshing to hear one member of the Scientific Policy Committee
declare on Monday that we should never forget that the LHC is not a
turnkey machine.

With the progress the LHC is making, that simple fact would be easy to
overlook. The figures coming back from this first run are already quite
remarkable. In week 10, the LHC's availability for the operators was over
65%: it usually takes a new accelerator years to reach that level of
availability. And over the last few weeks, operation of the LHC at 450 GeV
has become routinely reproducible, which is again a feat that usually
takes a new machine much longer to achieve.

All this augurs very well for the future, but we must not lose sight of
the fact that the LHC is new, and it wasn't bought off the shelf. It is a
state of the art prototype that is pushing the limits of technology across
a wide range of disciplines, and as such it needs to be treated with the
greatest respect. We have recovered well from the incident of 19 September
2008, and are now poised on the threshold of a new era of discovery. But
the legacy of that incident will be with us for some time to come.

As we approached 3.5 TeV, we encountered a phenomenon linked to the
machine protection systems that has obliged us to increase the ramp time
from 15 minutes to around 75. This will only be a temporary solution while
we correct this effect. With a machine like the LHC, this is typical of
the kind of challenge we face through the switch-on phase, and we must be
prepared for others.

Traditionally, CERN has operated its accelerators on an annual cycle,
running for seven to eight months with a four to five month shutdown each
year. With the LHC, things are different. Being a cryogenic machine
operating at very low temperature, the LHC takes about a month to bring up
to room temperature and another month to cool down. A four-month shutdown
as part of an annual cycle no longer makes sense for such a machine.  
That's why we decided in Chamonix to move to a longer cycle with longer
periods of operation accompanied by longer shutdown periods when needed.
Only when the repairs and consolidation are complete after the LHC's next
shutdown will we be fully able to consign 19 September 2008 to the history
books.

In the meantime, we can take satisfaction in what we have achieved to
date, while reminding ourselves, as that SPC delegate advised, that we are
breaking new ground technologically as well as scientifically. Our
stepwise approach, agreed by management, the machine and the experiments,
is the only sensible way to proceed. It takes time, but as we've seen this
week, patience pays dividends.

Rolf Heuer



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use