Hi Peter, Frank,

The Economist has an article on the BaBar T-violation results which I
spoke on at CIPANP 2012 and will speak on at CKM2012.  Just FYI...see
Abi's comment below (Abi is the BaBar PAC).

http://www.economist.com/science-technology

and

http://www.economist.com/node/21561111

Thank you,
--Ray


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Abi Soffer <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Newsgroups: http://babar-hn.slac.stanford.edu:5090/HyperNews/get/physAnal.html
Subject: The Economist covers BaBar result on T violation 

*** Discussion title: Physics Analysis
Email replies to [log in to unmask] must include:
  In-Reply-To: <"/physAnal/5221"@babar-hn.slac.stanford.edu>
  Subject: ...change this to be about your reply.

Dear friends,

The Economist Magazine found our result on T violation (
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1207.5832 ) appealing for their readership.
They wrote a detailed and high-level article about it,
http://www.economist.com/node/21561111 . This is currently featured at
the top of their science and technology section,
http://www.economist.com/science-technology .

It's great that we received this coverage, and special congratulations
go to the main authors of the analysis, Pablo, Fernando, and Jose, who
also wrote the theory paper on which the measurement is based. As
physicists, we will all tend to notice find some inaccuracies in the
article. But nitpicking aside, this is great news (pun intended).

Abi

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the LQS-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=LQS-L&A=1