LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK Archives


SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK Archives

SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK Archives


SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK Home

SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK Home

SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK  December 2012

SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK December 2012

Subject:

Re: Effective field theories for Snowmass gauge coupling studies

From:

Shih-Chieh Hsu <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

snowmass-electroweak Snowmass 2013 Electroweak study group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:48:30 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (68 lines)

Sorry for that I didn't complete my email. Please see a small 
modifications below.

On 12/12/12 1:41 PM, Shih-Chieh Hsu wrote:
> Dear Oscar, Celine and Michael,
>
> Thank you very much for your comprehensive introductions of your 
> electroweak effective field theories.
> I learned more depth about different aspects of your EFT today.
>
> I have a couple of questions looking forward to your further comments.
>
> Q1. What is the appropriate approach to probe gauge couplings
> in a consistent way in inclusive diboson, VBS diboson+jj and triboton 
> production at hadron colliders?
>
> Celine commented that we don't need energy dependence form factor
> to preserve unitary for WW production by considering all dimension 6 
> operators.
> However, Michael use VBS WW+jj production as an example to show that 
> we need to
> introduce s^hat dependent form factor in order to preserve unitarity.
> The TGC limit derived in inclusive WW might not be compared to the TGC 
> limit
> derived in VBS WW+jet neither Triboson production.
>
> Q2. Could Oscar give us a summary of the coupling constants with
> necessary form factor for the Dimension 6  and Dimension8 operators?
> To my understanding, we only introduce Dimension 8 operators for 
> neutral gauge couplings.
For practical approaches, we agreed to only introduce Dimension 8 
operators for neutral gauge couplings.

Cheers,

Shih-Chieh

>
> Q3. It looks to me VBFNLO, MadGraph5 and Oscar's package all implement 
> the same effective field theory.
>       Do I understand it correctly that we should be able to reproduce 
> the same calculations
>       from each generator?
>
> Q4. In the end, the TGC/QGC operators are linear expansions of the 
> effective Lagrangian.
>       Do I expect  the production cross-section can be represented as 
> a quadratic dependent function
>      of each gauge coupling coefficients?
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> Shih-Chieh
>
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK list, click the following 
> link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK&A=1 
>

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-ELECTROWEAK&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2014
June 2014
October 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use