wait, but here i think the filesystem rejects you, not the plugin (FS says permission denied)
is it correct? In our case we would like Xrootd to say no-go (based on VOMS) before even attempting the file::Open
my impression from this log is instead that the plugin said "please go ahead"
tom
On Feb 7, 2013, at 11:02 PM, "Yang, Wei" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I am an atlas user. I have this config
>
> -vomsfunparms:certfmt=raw|dbg|vos=cms|grps=/atlas
>
> and it correctly rejected me:
>
> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /DC=org/DC=doegrids/OU=People/CN=Wei Yang 74203/CN=proxy
> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=org/DC=doegrids/OU=People/CN=Wei Yang 74203
> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: atlas
> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: VOMS extensions do not match required criteria (/atlas;vos=cms)
> 130207 13:57:32 6683 XrootdXeq: yangw.17099:8@atlint01 login as 684536c7.0
> 130207 13:57:32 6683 ofs_open: yangw.17099:8@atlint01 Unable to open /atlas/dq2/user/HironoriIto/user.HironoriIto.xrootd.wt2/user.HironoriIto.xrootd.wt2-100M; Permission denied
>
> it allows me to connect but ultimately I am rejected because the oss.authdb has "g /atlas /path rl". This is the version before Gerri's fix of the uninitialized string, and it is slc5-gcc4.1.
>
> regards,
> Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O)
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:12 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>
>> too optimistic unfortunately: an atlas user is allowed
>>
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 stupputi.6186:[log in to unmask] XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=5877
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsi_Authenticate: WARNING: user mapping lookup ok, but the requested user is not authorized (stupputi). Instead, mapped as .atlas.
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Salvatore Alessandro Tupputi/CN=proxy
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Salvatore Alessandro Tupputi
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: atlas
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/atlas', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/atlas/it', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/atlas/lcg1', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/atlas/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/atlas/it/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/atlas/lcg1/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 stupputi.6186:[log in to unmask] XrootdResponse: 0100 sending OK
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 XrootdMonitor: 196 bytes sent to xrootd.t2.ucsd.edu:9930 rc=0
>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 XrootdXeq: stupputi.6186:[log in to unmask] login as .atlas
>>
>> any idea why is wrong?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> tom
>>
>>
>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 11:10 , Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>
and non cms user gets
>>>
>>> 130207 11:01:43 5718 XrdSched: scheduling monitor window clock in 5 seconds
>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 tentiams.685:[log in to unmask] XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=5349
>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsi_Authenticate: WARNING: user mapping lookup ok, but the requested user is not authorized (tentiams). Instead, mapped as .dteam.
>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Matteo Tenti/CN=proxy
>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Matteo Tenti
>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval FAILED: Cannot verify AC signature!
>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsi_Authenticate: ERROR: the VOMS extraction plug-in reported a failure for this handshake
>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 XrootdXeq: User authentication failed;
>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 tentiams.685:[log in to unmask] XrootdResponse: 0100 sending err 3010:
>>> 130207 11:01:43 4964 XrdInet: Accepted connection from [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> if this is what is expected, we are good to go
>>>
>>> tom
>>>
>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:12 , Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ciao gerri, for the moment I have the _impression_ it is working:
>>>>
>>>> 130207 10:08:18 4968 XrdSched: scheduling stats reporter in 30 seconds
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4964 XrdInet: Accepted connection from [log in to unmask]
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 XrdSched: running ?:8@so1wn60 inq=0
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 XrdProtocol: matched protocol xrootd
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 ?:8@so1wn60 XrdPoll: FD 8 attached to poller 0; num=1
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 ?:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3007 dlen=0
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdResponse: 0100 sending 50 data bytes; status=0
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=101
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 more auth requested; sz=1837
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdResponse: 0100 sending 1837 data bytes; status=4002
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=15253
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsi_Authenticate: WARNING: user mapping lookup ok, but the requested user is not authorized (cmsprd). Instead, mapped as cmssgm.
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=pro
>>>> xy/CN=proxy/CN=limited proxy
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/
>>>> CN=proxy
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/
>>>> CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: cms
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms', role: 'production', cap: 'NULL'
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms/TEAM', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms/dbs', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/Role=production/Capability=NULL'
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/TEAM/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/dbs/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdResponse: 0100 sending OK
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> is this what you would expect?
>>>>
>>>> config is as simple as
>>>>
>>>> sec.protparm gsi -vomsfun:/usr/lib64/libXrdSecgsiVOMS.so -vomsfunparms:grpopt=0|vos=cms|certfmt=raw
>>>> sec.protocol /usr/lib64 gsi -certdir:/etc/grid-security/certificates -cert:/etc/grid-security/xrd/hostcert.pem -key:/etc/grid-security/xrd/hostkey.pem -crl:3 -moninfo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:00 , Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ok thanks, will do
>>>>> because I found out voms 2.0.8 requires a change EMI1->EMI2 which is not that trivial on a production machine
>>>>>
>>>>> tom
>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 9:58 , Gerardo Ganis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My statement 'The builds require VOMS 2.0.8' is probably too strong. The right statement is probably
>>>>>> 'require VOMS 2.x', so I would give a try with 2.0.7 before bothering finding ways to update ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers, Gerri
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/7/13 9:12 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>>>>> ciao Gerri, starting to look into this
(sorry for the delay)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am stuck at point #1:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. The builds require VOMS 2.0.8 which, if I understand correctly, is a not (yet?) available in OSG
>>>>>>> I have
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [root@stormgf1 xroot-tests]# rpm -qa|grep voms
>>>>>>> voms-2.0.7-1.el5.x86_64
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I need to find a way to update this
standard way from the repository does not allow me to get a 2.0.8
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> stay tuned
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 18:42 , Gerardo Ganis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is the status of things:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The plug-in is available for test at 'https://github.com/gganis/voms.git' from where you can download
>>>>>>>> the sources. Binaries for SLC5 (x86_64, gcc-4.1, gcc 4.3) and SLC6 (x86_64, gcc-4.6) are available under
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /afs/cern.ch/work/g/ganis/public/vomsxrd/vomsxrd-0.0.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (README and examples under /afs/cern.ch/work/g/ganis/public/vomsxrd).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With the following caveats:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. The builds require VOMS 2.0.8 which, if I understand correctly, is a not (yet?) available in OSG
>>>>>>>> 2. Unfortunately the backport of the vomsfun functionality was not complete in the 3.2.x stable branch,
>>>>>>>> so to use the plug-in you have either to use the HEAD of the 'stable' branch or 3.3.x-rc1 .
>>>>>>>> RPMs for the stable branch are available from the Teamcity portal:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://teamcity-dss.cern.ch:8443/project.html?projectId=project13&tab=projectOverview
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you please let me know if you can try this out or what you miss to be able to try?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gerri
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/31/13 7:19 PM, Yang, Wei wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I haven't get it to work yet. I am communicating with the developer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>> Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:28 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Follow-up Comment #2, sr #135141 (project xrootd):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ciao, news on that plugin?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Reply to this item at:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://savannah.cern.ch/support/?135141>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Message sent via/by LCG Savannah
>>>>>>>>>> http://savannah.cern.ch/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>>>> Gerardo GANIS CERN, PH Dept, SFT group, CH 1211 Geneve 23
>>>>>>>> room: 32-RC-006, tel: +41 22 7676439
>>>>>>>> email: [log in to unmask], fax: +41 22 7669133
>>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
|