Hi,
The point is that by default VOMS attributes are not required, so a
failure of he extraction step
does not imply a authentication failure.
Can you try adding '-vomsat:2' in the sec.protocol gsi directive ?
Gerri
On 2/8/13 6:25 PM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
> uhm, but this could work for me also
>
> I will try in the week end and report back ;)
>
> tom
> On Feb 8, 2013, at 18:19 , "Yang, Wei" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I guess you are right. Since I have (and only have) 'g /atlas /path rl' in oss.authdb file. Users that doesn't have group '/atlas' filled in XrdSecEntity.grps will be rejected.
>>
>> regards,
>> Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:19 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>
>>> wait, but here i think the filesystem rejects you, not the plugin (FS says permission denied)
is it correct? In our case we would like Xrootd to say no-go (based on VOMS) before even attempting the file::Open
>>>
>>> my impression from this log is instead that the plugin said "please go ahead"
>>>
>>>
>>> tom
>>>
>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 11:02 PM, "Yang, Wei" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am an atlas user. I have this config
>>>>
>>>> -vomsfunparms:certfmt=raw|dbg|vos=cms|grps=/atlas
>>>>
>>>> and it correctly rejected me:
>>>>
>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /DC=org/DC=doegrids/OU=People/CN=Wei Yang 74203/CN=proxy
>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=org/DC=doegrids/OU=People/CN=Wei Yang 74203
>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: atlas
>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: VOMS extensions do not match required criteria (/atlas;vos=cms)
>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 XrootdXeq: yangw.17099:8@atlint01 login as 684536c7.0
>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 ofs_open: yangw.17099:8@atlint01 Unable to open /atlas/dq2/user/HironoriIto/user.HironoriIto.xrootd.wt2/user.HironoriIto.xrootd.wt2-100M; Permission denied
>>>>
>>>> it allows me to connect but ultimately I am rejected because the oss.authdb has "g /atlas /path rl". This is the version before Gerri's fix of the uninitialized string, and it is slc5-gcc4.1.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:12 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> too optimistic unfortunately: an atlas user is allowed
>>>>>
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 stupputi.6186:[log in to unmask] XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=5877
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsi_Authenticate: WARNING: user mapping lookup ok, but the requested user is not authorized (stupputi). Instead, mapped as .atlas.
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Salvatore Alessandro Tupputi/CN=proxy
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Salvatore Alessandro Tupputi
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: atlas
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/atlas', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/atlas/it', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/atlas/lcg1', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/atlas/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/atlas/it/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/atlas/lcg1/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 stupputi.6186:[log in to unmask] XrootdResponse: 0100 sending OK
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 XrootdMonitor: 196 bytes sent to xrootd.t2.ucsd.edu:9930 rc=0
>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 XrootdXeq: stupputi.6186:[log in to unmask] login as .atlas
>>>>>
>>>>> any idea why is wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> tom
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 11:10 , Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
and non cms user gets
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5718 XrdSched: scheduling monitor window clock in 5 seconds
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 tentiams.685:[log in to unmask] XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=5349
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsi_Authenticate: WARNING: user mapping lookup ok, but the requested user is not authorized (tentiams). Instead, mapped as .dteam.
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Matteo Tenti/CN=proxy
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Matteo Tenti
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval FAILED: Cannot verify AC signature!
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsi_Authenticate: ERROR: the VOMS extraction plug-in reported a failure for this handshake
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 XrootdXeq: User authentication failed;
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 tentiams.685:[log in to unmask] XrootdResponse: 0100 sending err 3010:
>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 4964 XrdInet: Accepted connection from [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if this is what is expected, we are good to go
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:12 , Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ciao gerri, for the moment I have the _impression_ it is working:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:18 4968 XrdSched: scheduling stats reporter in 30 seconds
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4964 XrdInet: Accepted connection from [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 XrdSched: running ?:8@so1wn60 inq=0
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 XrdProtocol: matched protocol xrootd
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 ?:8@so1wn60 XrdPoll: FD 8 attached to poller 0; num=1
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 ?:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3007 dlen=0
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdResponse: 0100 sending 50 data bytes; status=0
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=101
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 more auth requested; sz=1837
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdResponse: 0100 sending 1837 data bytes; status=4002
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=15253
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsi_Authenticate: WARNING: user mapping lookup ok, but the requested user is not authorized (cmsprd). Instead, mapped as cmssgm.
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=pro
>>>>>>> xy/CN=proxy/CN=limited proxy
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/
>>>>>>> CN=proxy
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/
>>>>>>> CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: cms
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms', role: 'production', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms/TEAM', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms/dbs', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/Role=production/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/TEAM/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/dbs/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdResponse: 0100 sending OK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is this what you would expect?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> config is as simple as
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sec.protparm gsi -vomsfun:/usr/lib64/libXrdSecgsiVOMS.so -vomsfunparms:grpopt=0|vos=cms|certfmt=raw
>>>>>>> sec.protocol /usr/lib64 gsi -certdir:/etc/grid-security/certificates -cert:/etc/grid-security/xrd/hostcert.pem -key:/etc/grid-security/xrd/hostkey.pem -crl:3 -moninfo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:00 , Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ok thanks, will do
>>>>>>>> because I found out voms 2.0.8 requires a change EMI1->EMI2 which is not that trivial on a production machine
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 9:58 , Gerardo Ganis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My statement 'The builds require VOMS 2.0.8' is probably too strong. The right statement is probably
>>>>>>>>> 'require VOMS 2.x', so I would give a try with 2.0.7 before bothering finding ways to update ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Gerri
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/13 9:12 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ciao Gerri, starting to look into this
(sorry for the delay)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am stuck at point #1:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. The builds require VOMS 2.0.8 which, if I understand correctly, is a not (yet?) available in OSG
>>>>>>>>>> I have
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [root@stormgf1 xroot-tests]# rpm -qa|grep voms
>>>>>>>>>> voms-2.0.7-1.el5.x86_64
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So I need to find a way to update this
standard way from the repository does not allow me to get a 2.0.8
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> stay tuned
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 18:42 , Gerardo Ganis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is the status of things:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The plug-in is available for test at 'https://github.com/gganis/voms.git' from where you can download
>>>>>>>>>>> the sources. Binaries for SLC5 (x86_64, gcc-4.1, gcc 4.3) and SLC6 (x86_64, gcc-4.6) are available under
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> /afs/cern.ch/work/g/ganis/public/vomsxrd/vomsxrd-0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (README and examples under /afs/cern.ch/work/g/ganis/public/vomsxrd).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With the following caveats:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. The builds require VOMS 2.0.8 which, if I understand correctly, is a not (yet?) available in OSG
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Unfortunately the backport of the vomsfun functionality was not complete in the 3.2.x stable branch,
>>>>>>>>>>> so to use the plug-in you have either to use the HEAD of the 'stable' branch or 3.3.x-rc1 .
>>>>>>>>>>> RPMs for the stable branch are available from the Teamcity portal:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://teamcity-dss.cern.ch:8443/project.html?projectId=project13&tab=projectOverview
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please let me know if you can try this out or what you miss to be able to try?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gerri
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/31/13 7:19 PM, Yang, Wei wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> I haven't get it to work yet. I am communicating with the developer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:28 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Follow-up Comment #2, sr #135141 (project xrootd):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ciao, news on that plugin?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reply to this item at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://savannah.cern.ch/support/?135141>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Message sent via/by LCG Savannah
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://savannah.cern.ch/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>> Gerardo GANIS CERN, PH Dept, SFT group, CH 1211 Geneve 23
>>>>>>>>>>> room: 32-RC-006, tel: +41 22 7676439
>>>>>>>>>>> email: [log in to unmask], fax: +41 22 7669133
>>>>>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
|