Hi Tom,
Very good, thanks for the feedback.
Next step is to provide the RPMs ...
Gerri
On 2/11/13 10:46 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
> so ok, all seems fine at the moment:
>
> for a denied access I now get
>
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Stefano Perazzini/CN=proxy
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Stefano Perazzini
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: lhcb
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 secgsiVOMS_Fun: VOMS extensions do not match required criteria (grpopt=0;grps=/cms;vos=cms)
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 secgsi_Authenticate: ERROR: the VOMS extraction plug-in reported a failure for this handshake
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 XrootdXeq: User authentication failed;
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 perazzin.2012:[log in to unmask] XrootdResponse: 0100 sending err 3010:
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 perazzin.2012:[log in to unmask] XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3010 dlen=160
> 130211 09:58:43 17677 perazzin.2012:[log in to unmask] XrootdResponse: 0100 sending err 3006: Invalid request; user not authenticated
>
> which is fine
> I checked I can still open the file with my cms proxy ;)
>
> On Feb 9, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> ciao gerri, thanks for the explanation, I will test on monday since a need a !cms around
>>
>> tom
>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 18:34 , Gerardo Ganis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The point is that by default VOMS attributes are not required, so a failure of he extraction step
>>> does not imply a authentication failure.
>>> Can you try adding '-vomsat:2' in the sec.protocol gsi directive ?
>>>
>>> Gerri
>>>
>>> On 2/8/13 6:25 PM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>> uhm, but this could work for me also
>>>>
>>>> I will try in the week end and report back ;)
>>>>
>>>> tom
>>>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 18:19 , "Yang, Wei" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I guess you are right. Since I have (and only have) 'g /atlas /path rl' in oss.authdb file. Users that doesn't have group '/atlas' filled in XrdSecEntity.grps will be rejected.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:19 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> wait, but here i think the filesystem rejects you, not the plugin (FS says permission denied)
is it correct? In our case we would like Xrootd to say no-go (based on VOMS) before even attempting the file::Open
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my impression from this log is instead that the plugin said "please go ahead"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 11:02 PM, "Yang, Wei" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am an atlas user. I have this config
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -vomsfunparms:certfmt=raw|dbg|vos=cms|grps=/atlas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and it correctly rejected me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /DC=org/DC=doegrids/OU=People/CN=Wei Yang 74203/CN=proxy
>>>>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=org/DC=doegrids/OU=People/CN=Wei Yang 74203
>>>>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
>>>>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: atlas
>>>>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 secgsiVOMS_Fun: VOMS extensions do not match required criteria (/atlas;vos=cms)
>>>>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 XrootdXeq: yangw.17099:8@atlint01 login as 684536c7.0
>>>>>>> 130207 13:57:32 6683 ofs_open: yangw.17099:8@atlint01 Unable to open /atlas/dq2/user/HironoriIto/user.HironoriIto.xrootd.wt2/user.HironoriIto.xrootd.wt2-100M; Permission denied
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it allows me to connect but ultimately I am rejected because the oss.authdb has "g /atlas /path rl". This is the version before Gerri's fix of the uninitialized string, and it is slc5-gcc4.1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:12 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> too optimistic unfortunately: an atlas user is allowed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 stupputi.6186:[log in to unmask] XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=5877
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsi_Authenticate: WARNING: user mapping lookup ok, but the requested user is not authorized (stupputi). Instead, mapped as .atlas.
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Salvatore Alessandro Tupputi/CN=proxy
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Salvatore Alessandro Tupputi
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: atlas
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/atlas', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/atlas/it', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/atlas/lcg1', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/atlas/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/atlas/it/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/atlas/lcg1/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 stupputi.6186:[log in to unmask] XrootdResponse: 0100 sending OK
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 XrootdMonitor: 196 bytes sent to xrootd.t2.ucsd.edu:9930 rc=0
>>>>>>>> 130207 11:09:51 5718 XrootdXeq: stupputi.6186:[log in to unmask] login as .atlas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> any idea why is wrong?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 11:10 , Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
and non cms user gets
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5718 XrdSched: scheduling monitor window clock in 5 seconds
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 tentiams.685:[log in to unmask] XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=5349
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsi_Authenticate: WARNING: user mapping lookup ok, but the requested user is not authorized (tentiams). Instead, mapped as .dteam.
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Matteo Tenti/CN=proxy
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /C=IT/O=INFN/OU=Personal Certificate/L=CNAF/CN=Matteo Tenti
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval FAILED: Cannot verify AC signature!
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 secgsi_Authenticate: ERROR: the VOMS extraction plug-in reported a failure for this handshake
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 XrootdXeq: User authentication failed;
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 5846 tentiams.685:[log in to unmask] XrootdResponse: 0100 sending err 3010:
>>>>>>>>> 130207 11:01:43 4964 XrdInet: Accepted connection from [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> if this is what is expected, we are good to go
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:12 , Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ciao gerri, for the moment I have the _impression_ it is working:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:18 4968 XrdSched: scheduling stats reporter in 30 seconds
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4964 XrdInet: Accepted connection from [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 XrdSched: running ?:8@so1wn60 inq=0
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 XrdProtocol: matched protocol xrootd
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 ?:8@so1wn60 XrdPoll: FD 8 attached to poller 0; num=1
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 ?:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3007 dlen=0
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdResponse: 0100 sending 50 data bytes; status=0
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=101
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 more auth requested; sz=1837
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdResponse: 0100 sending 1837 data bytes; status=4002
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdProtocol: 0100 req=3000 dlen=15253
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsi_Authenticate: WARNING: user mapping lookup ok, but the requested user is not authorized (cmsprd). Instead, mapped as cmssgm.
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: proxy: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=pro
>>>>>>>>>> xy/CN=proxy/CN=limited proxy
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/
>>>>>>>>>> CN=proxy
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: adding cert: /DC=ch/DC=cern/OU=Organic Units/OU=Users/CN=asciaba/CN=430796/CN=Andrea Sciaba/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/CN=proxy/
>>>>>>>>>> CN=proxy/CN=proxy
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: retrieval successful
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: found VO: cms
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms', role: 'production', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms/TEAM', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> group: '/cms/dbs', role: 'NULL', cap: 'NULL'
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/Role=production/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/TEAM/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 secgsiVOMS_Fun: ---> fqan: '/cms/dbs/Role=NULL/Capability=NULL'
>>>>>>>>>> 130207 10:08:19 4967 cmsprd.26556:8@so1wn60 XrootdResponse: 0100 sending OK
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> is this what you would expect?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> config is as simple as
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> sec.protparm gsi -vomsfun:/usr/lib64/libXrdSecgsiVOMS.so -vomsfunparms:grpopt=0|vos=cms|certfmt=raw
>>>>>>>>>> sec.protocol /usr/lib64 gsi -certdir:/etc/grid-security/certificates -cert:/etc/grid-security/xrd/hostcert.pem -key:/etc/grid-security/xrd/hostkey.pem -crl:3 -moninfo
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:00 , Tommaso Boccali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ok thanks, will do
>>>>>>>>>>> because I found out voms 2.0.8 requires a change EMI1->EMI2 which is not that trivial on a production machine
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 9:58 , Gerardo Ganis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My statement 'The builds require VOMS 2.0.8' is probably too strong. The right statement is probably
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'require VOMS 2.x', so I would give a try with 2.0.7 before bothering finding ways to update ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Gerri
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/13 9:12 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ciao Gerri, starting to look into this
(sorry for the delay)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am stuck at point #1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. The builds require VOMS 2.0.8 which, if I understand correctly, is a not (yet?) available in OSG
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [root@stormgf1 xroot-tests]# rpm -qa|grep voms
>>>>>>>>>>>>> voms-2.0.7-1.el5.x86_64
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I need to find a way to update this
standard way from the repository does not allow me to get a 2.0.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stay tuned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 18:42 , Gerardo Ganis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the status of things:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The plug-in is available for test at 'https://github.com/gganis/voms.git' from where you can download
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the sources. Binaries for SLC5 (x86_64, gcc-4.1, gcc 4.3) and SLC6 (x86_64, gcc-4.6) are available under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /afs/cern.ch/work/g/ganis/public/vomsxrd/vomsxrd-0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (README and examples under /afs/cern.ch/work/g/ganis/public/vomsxrd).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the following caveats:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. The builds require VOMS 2.0.8 which, if I understand correctly, is a not (yet?) available in OSG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Unfortunately the backport of the vomsfun functionality was not complete in the 3.2.x stable branch,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so to use the plug-in you have either to use the HEAD of the 'stable' branch or 3.3.x-rc1 .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RPMs for the stable branch are available from the Teamcity portal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://teamcity-dss.cern.ch:8443/project.html?projectId=project13&tab=projectOverview
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please let me know if you can try this out or what you miss to be able to try?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gerri
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/31/13 7:19 PM, Yang, Wei wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I haven't get it to work yet. I am communicating with the developer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wei Yang | [log in to unmask] | 650-926-3338(O)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:28 AM, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Follow-up Comment #2, sr #135141 (project xrootd):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ciao, news on that plugin?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reply to this item at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://savannah.cern.ch/support/?135141>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Message sent via/by LCG Savannah
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://savannah.cern.ch/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gerardo GANIS CERN, PH Dept, SFT group, CH 1211 Geneve 23
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> room: 32-RC-006, tel: +41 22 7676439
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: [log in to unmask], fax: +41 22 7669133
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
|