LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L Archives

QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L  September 2013

QSERV-L September 2013

Subject:

Re: For November brainstorming

From:

Jacek Becla <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

General discussion for qserv (LSST prototype baseline catalog)

Date:

Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:33:09 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (47 lines)

Mario

thanks, forwarding to the qserv mailing list

Jacek



On 09/24/2013 02:26 PM, Mario Juric wrote:
> Jacek,
> 	Here's something for you and the team to think about in November: how
> would you modify qserv to download and cache chunks on-demand?
>
> 	Imagine the following scenario: scientist M at university H has access
> to 200+ nodes w. petabytes of storage. They install qserv, and configure
> it in a mode where it initially downloads only the metadata from the
> LSST Archive (e.g., where the chunks are, how many of them are there,
> which tables are where, etc.). When a query is fired against that
> database, it downloads the chunks touched by the query and caches them
> for future use. Note that if no query ever touched a particular table,
> those chunks would never get downloaded (e.g., a stellar astronomer
> would never download the table with bdSamples). After an initial period
> of downloading/caching, the database would asymptote to a steady state
> mode where all frequently queried tables are cached locally (thus
> offloading our database). Bonus points for allowing bootstrapping with
> mass-downloaded data (or sneakernet delivered disks), or expiration of
> rarely accessed chunks.
>
> 	This was a killer feature for LSD [*] (combined with on-the-fly
> cross-matching against remote catalogs, which is a simple extension).
> I'm willing to bet people would use it if we supplied it. It may also
> solve our issue with the number of replicas needed to guard against
> failure, since we could configure our Archive center database to fetch
> any chunks that it doesn't have (e.g., because the nodes have failed)
> from the Chilean or French site.
>
> [*] http://mwscience.net/trac/wiki/ReleaseNotes_0_5_4
>
> Have fun :),
>

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
August 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use