LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SNOWMASS-EF Archives


SNOWMASS-EF Archives

SNOWMASS-EF Archives


SNOWMASS-EF@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SNOWMASS-EF Home

SNOWMASS-EF Home

SNOWMASS-EF  October 2013

SNOWMASS-EF October 2013

Subject:

Energy Frontier reports - sent !

From:

"Peskin, Michael E." <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

snowmass-ef Snowmass 2013 Energy Frontier conveners <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:03:26 -0700

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (50 lines) , EF_10-15.pdf (50 lines) , EF_summary_10-15.pdf (50 lines) , EF-10-15-changes.txt (1 lines)


Dear Colleagues,

Our discussion on Thursday and the followup email exchange was very productive.  I hope 
that you have been receiving my emails with the successive changes.  Chip and I feel that those 
people who objected to parts of the original version are happy with the current revision.

Chip and I decided that we have achieved sufficient convergence on the Energy Frontier reports to 
send them up to the Snowmass conveners.  (Jon Rosner is very, very impatient to receive 
these reports.)  Please find attached the versions of the two reports that were sent,
and a listing of changes from yesterday.  Thanks to all of you for your help in getting these
documents as correct as possible.

The process from here is the following:

1.  The long report will be read by the professional editor hired by the DPF for the Snowmass
proceedings.  I will meet with her next Monday to go over her style and wording suggestions.
The report will also be read by "Reading Committee" of DPF officers.  They will also recommend
wording changes for clarity.  Chip and I control which changes are implemented, and we will
respect your opinions.

2.  The short report will become part of the overall Snowmass summary document.  This will
also be read by the professional editor and my the Reading Committee.  Jon Rosner has the 
final say on what goes in the document, but we will try to preserve the current content as 
best we can.

3.  The timeline above means that there is still time for further corrections.  If you see more 
typos or wrong numbers, send them to me and I will include those fixes in the revisions.
The sooner the better.

4.  It is time to complete the working group reports.  Please go into the final phase.  These
must be done (final final final) by about October 25.

Thank you very much!!

Michael 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Michael E. Peskin                           [log in to unmask]
  HEP Theory Group, MS 81                       -------
  SLAC National Accelerator Lab.        phone: 1-(650)-926-3250
  2575 Sand Hill Road                       fax:     1-(650)-926-2525
  Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA              www.slac.stanford.edu/~mpeskin/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1



more changes to the EF report: these changes are listed by line number in the 10-14 versions of the short and long reports. Short document -------------- Major changes: all question numbers (Q#2) deleted at Jon Rosner's request. 71 Many people in our phone meeting were uncomfortable with the estimate that the properties of the Higgs are known to 30% accuracy. I have changed this sentence to the less committal: Many properties of this particle have now been measured and, up to this point, are consistent with those of the Higgs boson of the minimal Standard Model. I am sorry that I forgot to do this earlier. Nontrivial changes: Number updates: Long document ------------- Major changes: 1291 Addition to the acknowledgement of the people who organized meetings. Thanks to Ashutosh for this suggestion. 1167 Ashutosh recommended a change the wording of the VLHC endorsement. The 10-14 version lists the New Physics conveners, but this is our general consensus. The passage now reads: One of the ideas at Snowmass that gained momentum through the week was renewed interest in a Very Large Hadron Collider (VLHC). Our study recommends reinvigorating R\&D toward realization of a VLHC. 1224 I have rewritten this paragraph to emphasize that the whole pattern of Higgs couplings is shifted in this model. Nontrivial changes: 1261 highly motivated -> compelling per Ashutosh (actually, I do not know which language is stronger, but compelling is what we said earlier) Number updates: 358 updated plot from Rick 555 7 -> 16 per Ashutosh ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the SNOWMASS-EF list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=SNOWMASS-EF&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use