LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L Archives


ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L Archives

ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L Archives


ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L Home

ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L Home

ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L  January 2014

ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L January 2014

Subject:

Re: T2 Reliability & Availability - November 2013

From:

"Yang, Wei" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Atlas SCCS Planning Mailing List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:42:48 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (99 lines)

Hi,

The first algorithm will be replaced by the VO-based (second) algorithm starting this month (Jan, 2014). So we have been working with WLCG to identify what them measure. Grid jobs for the new algorithm require outbound TCP connection from batch nodes which we didn't have until Oct/Nov. It takes many iterations to identify these types of issues. I am in close contact with those people at WLCG to straight out individual benchmarks but so far we can't identify exactly which benchmarks are used in the reports (for WT2). So getting the month report in the new algorithm timely is important to us.

regards,
Wei Yang  |  [log in to unmask]  |  1-650-926-3338




On Jan 9, 2014, at 9:32 AM, "Young, Charles C." <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Wei, 
> 
> Happy new year. Thanks for the report. I have some questions. The file https://espace.cern.ch/WLCG-document-repository/ReliabilityAvailability/Tier-2/2013/WLCG_Tier2_OPS_Nov2013.pdf and the "new VO-based reports" can paint very different pictures. I am looking at availability history (starting at page 3 and page 5 respectively). Scroll down to US-WT2. The numbers in the first report are: 94%, 94%, 1%, 93%, 97% and 97%, while the numbers in the second report are: 84%, 84%, 18%, 1%, 0%, 0%. I don't believe we were totally unavailable for August, September and October — the last three numbers. The second set must be screwed up. 
> 
> We are not the only one with massive differences. On the other hand, there are also sites with relatively small differences between the two reports. I can see that they differ in the algorithms used to compute availability. They must also have a different calculation for availability because the second numbers don't agree. I would not argue that the first report's algorithms are perfect, but I would certainly argue that the second one's are no good. 
> 
> This may be well known and understood. It's just that I haven't looked carefully for some time. Cheers.
> 
> Charlie
> --
> Charles C. Young
> M.S. 43, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center      
> P.O. Box 20450                                        
> Stanford, CA 94309                                      
> [log in to unmask]                                
> voice  (650) 926 2669                        
> fax    (650) 926 2923                      
> CERN GSM +41 76 487 2069
> 
> From: <Yang>, Wei Yang <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 12:04 AM
> To: atlas-sccs-planning-l <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Fwd: T2 Reliability & Availability - November 2013
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: WLCG Office <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: RE: T2 Reliability & Availability - November 2013
>> Date: January 8, 2014 at 11:49:29 PM PST
>> To: "project-wlcg-cb (Members of the WLCG CB)" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Cc: "project-lcg-gdb (LCG - Grid Deployment Board)" <[log in to unmask]>, "sam-support (SAM support)" <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> The final T2 reliability & availability report for November is here:
>> 
>> https://espace.cern.ch/WLCG-document-repository/ReliabilityAvailability/Tier-2/2013/WLCG_Tier2_OPS_Nov2013.pdf
>> 
>> Please also check the new VO-based reports for November here, which include all re-computation requests received.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Cath
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> WLCG Office
>> IT Dept - CERN
>> CH-1211 Genève, Switzerland
>> www.cern.ch/wlcg
>> From: WLCG Office
>> Sent: 05 December 2013 09:28
>> To: project-wlcg-cb (Members of the WLCG CB)
>> Cc: project-lcg-gdb (LCG - Grid Deployment Board); sam-support (SAM support); [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: T2 Reliability & Availability - November 2013
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> The draft T2 reliability & availability report for November is now available at:
>> 
>> http://sam-reports.web.cern.ch/sam-reports/2013/201311/wlcg/WLCG_Tier2_OPS_Nov2013.pdf
>> 
>> Please verify your data and send comments to WLCG Office by 15 December.
>> 
>> All requests for recomputation must be sent via GGUS within 10 calendar days of this e-mail being sent - further details here.
>> 
>> Reminder: please check the new VO-based Availability Reports - November reports are here.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Cath
>> 
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> WLCG Office
>> IT Dept - CERN
>> CH-1211 Genève, Switzerland
>> www.cern.ch/wlcg
> 
> 
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
> To unsubscribe from the ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L&A=1

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=ATLAS-SCCS-PLANNING-L&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
November 2015
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use