LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE Archives


KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE Archives

KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE Archives


KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE Home

KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE Home

KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE  April 2014

KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE April 2014

Subject:

Re: Retrieving KpixCalibration

From:

Kyle Travis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion of software development for the KPiX beamtest <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:51:57 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (62 lines)

Okay, I'm now successfully able to retrieve a KpixCalibration using the 
default steering file, which is great. I ran into an issue along the 
way, however, which was specifying the address of the layer in reference 
to the KpixCalibrationSet. I had been using "getCalibration" which has 
kpixAsic as its first argument, and passing the first value in my 
calibration file, which appears as "<kpixAsic id=1015>..." for the first 
layer. Unless I'm mistaken, that number gets treated as the serial by 
KpixCalibrationSet, because I was only able to retrieve a calibration 
with the number 1015 when I passed it as the first argument to 
"getCalibrationBySerial".

Is this intentional? If so, what is the standard of addressing the 
different layers? Sorry if I missed something obvious here, but I want 
to make sure I can consistently get the right address without ignoring 
certain calibrations.

Thanks!

Kyle


On 2014/04/23 14:32, Dmitry Onoprienko wrote:
> Hello Kyle,
> 
> I made constructors for specific record types public.
> 
> - Dmitry.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kyle Travis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:41 PM
>> To: Onoprienko, Dmitry
>> Cc: kpix-beamtest-software
>> Subject: Re: [KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE] Retrieving KpixCalibration
>> 
>> Hi Dmitry,
>> 
>> Thanks, that example helps a lot. Unfortunately I'm running into 
>> another
>> issue, which is that the KpixDataRecord constructor is only accessibly
>> within the KpixReader package. This makes me wonder, would it be 
>> better
>> to have the simulation hit -> KpixDataRecord within the KpixReader
>> package for consistency, or is there another solution for this?
>> 
>> Thanks again,
>> 
>> Kyle
> 
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
> 
> To unsubscribe from the KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE list, click the 
> following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE&A=1

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=KPIX-BEAMTEST-SOFTWARE&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use