Hi Matevz,
I think that I can comment on this historical item.
Yes, the reproduceability was explicitely requested a couple of
aeons ago. It made sense to me too, easing the debugging.
For the other issue with attempt #7 I don't know...
Fabrizio
On 24/04/14 11:20, Tommaso Boccali wrote:
> please note another thing:
>
> unsigned int seed = XrdOucCRC::CRC32((const unsigned
> char*)unfo.File.c_str(), unfo.File.length());
>
> so per file always the same random number is spit out, is this wanted?
> clearly to have this working one needs the “else” to be operational
> above, otherwise there is neither randomness, not retry ….
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1
|