LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L Archives

QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L  May 2014

QSERV-L May 2014

Subject:

Re: how to do the merging

From:

Jacek Becla <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

General discussion for qserv (LSST prototype baseline catalog)

Date:

Tue, 20 May 2014 19:00:36 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (57 lines)

K-T

>   + Rebasing history that has already been pushed is problematic.  I can
> see this for u/ branches, but it's more questionable for tickets/
> branches.  It messes up other people's history.

I thought:
a) we are now creating a "backup" branch through a hook
    on every rebase, and rebasing has been OK'ed/accepted,
    have I misinterpreted anything?
b) people are not supposed to base their work on other
    people's branches, so how does it mess up other people's
    history? (provided we are not overwriting history
    for master)

I guess we could switch to doing all messy work in u/
branches and push the final squashed and rebased version
to tickets/DM-*.


>   + You need to build and test after your rebase and cleanup.  You can do
> this after pushing your ticket but before merging to master (possibly
> using buildbot), or you can do the merge to master locally and test
> there before pushing the new master.  But assuming that the cleanup had
> no impact is dangerous.

Oh yes, I was only explaining the mechanics of doing the merging,
but indeed it might be useful to have a reminder about testing.


> 	I think "clean history" is somewhat in the eye of the beholder.
> I think the main way to maintain a useful history is to never merge from
> master/next/integration into a ticket branch.  Rebasing of the sort you
> have described seems to me to just avoid parallel branches, at possibly
> significant cost.

If we do the messy work in the next/integration branch,
I believe cleanly applying that work to master would be
a non-trivial job. But maybe I can be proven wrong.

My main goal is to find a way to keep it clean enough so that
we can always relatively easily track down what was done
when and how and by whom. With very convoluted history it
is getting exponentially harder with every messy merge.

Perhaps stop by tomorrow during Qserv Dev meeting?
We will discuss it there. Or maybe we want a DM-wide
discussion? Or maybe it is a SAT topic?

Jacek

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
August 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use