LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L Archives

QSERV-L Archives


QSERV-L@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L Home

QSERV-L  May 2014

QSERV-L May 2014

Subject:

Re: [LSST-data] [QSERV-L] how to do the merging

From:

Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

General discussion for qserv (LSST prototype baseline catalog)

Date:

Wed, 21 May 2014 09:20:38 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (63 lines)

Hello,

History rewriting seems to be an interesting feature. Indeed it allows the
developer to create more consistent commits before doing the merge to
master.
Indeed, commits made on the fly during the development process can be
sometime quite chaotic until the whole feature isn't finished, and tested.
These "chaotic" commits are nevertheless very usefull because it allows
the developper to easily go back and forth, at a small granularity, in its
current development task. I think this git feature increase a lot
developer productivity.

Jacek rebasing procedure proposal seems very usefull and I think it is
convenient to have a well-defined, documented and doable procedure in
order to support history rewriting, when this feature is needed.

Nevertheless, for now, it seems that next command :

git push tickets/DM-XX --force

isn't allowed for devs by gitolite access rights :

https://dev.lsstcorp.org/trac/wiki/GitDemoAndTutorial#Fullgitoliteconfigfile

Indeed RWC doesn't allow --force :
RWC     tickets/[0-9]+$         = @devs         # Allow creating and
pushing to tickets

So at least two diffent solutions would work here :
- enable RW+ right to ticket branch creator
- start developing in u/user/DM-xxx and do the rebase in tickets/DM-xxx ?

That's why, if history rewriting is considered as a required feature, it
seems that an "official" and common procedure for doing it would be very
usefull.

Cheers,

Fabrice

On Wed, May 21, 2014 6:45 am, Jacek Becla wrote:
>> So I guess maybe I'm saying the problem really starts earlier,
>> with too much being done on each ticket.
>
> Nope! Even if I have a small ticket, say it is only 1 hour
> worth of work, if I branch off master, do my work, and someone else changes
> master in the meantime... if I push my changes without proper merging or
> rebasing, the history will get convoluted.
>
> Jacek
> _______________________________________________
> LSST-data mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> http://listserv.lsstcorp.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
>
>

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
August 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use